On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:37:05 -0500
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
Yes, Levente's way of handling that after the fact is practical and
what I like to do, since then you keep all your DRC's working against
error, and have one more step to do after DRC complete. Perhaps that
method
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com writes:
On 04/06/2011 05:16 PM, Russell Dill wrote:
The use case I'm talking about, you have two nets, say GND and AGND1
which are two planes that are connected at a single point. Connecting
a component on the AGND1 side is different that connecting a
Vincent wrote:
How the inherited attributes are entered in components? I couldn't find
any information. I modified some preexisting component and then entered
new name, footprint etc. If check the box of inherited attributes they
show grayed but they are there. will they be disabled if the
DJ Delorie wrote:
python. It only does SMD dual column footprints with an outline -
and at the moment only takes mm.
Seems to be a popular thing to do. I did one a while ago, and mine
wasnt the first either...
How about inclusion of some of the more sophisticated scripts augmented
with
Kovacs Levente wrote:
Yes. There is a patch which adds the ability to ignore DRC.
http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Mar-2011/msg00096.html
This patch uses layer attributes to differentiate.
IMHO, for the split ground use case an attribute of an object (track, or
pad, or pin) would be more
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:10:02 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
This patch uses layer attributes to differentiate.
IMHO, for the split ground use case an attribute of an object (track,
or pad, or pin) would be more appropriate. Properties of objects can
be attached to a
Friends -
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 01:52:10PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
DJ Delorie wrote:
python. It only does SMD dual column footprints with an outline -
and at the moment only takes mm.
Seems to be a popular thing to do. I did one a while ago, and mine
wasnt the first either...
On 4/7/2011 5:34 AM, Kovacs Levente wrote:
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:37:05 -0500
John Griessenj...@ecosensory.com wrote:
Yes, Levente's way of handling that after the fact is practical and
what I like to do, since then you keep all your DRC's working against
error, and have one more step to do
Hello,
I very like the feature Krzysztof introduced with his patch and would
like to have this feature in PCB, too.
The appended patch does exactly the same for pcb. The only modification
is, that the struct 'compselect' is called 'library_window' in pcb.
I have also done a feature request
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Vincent [1]vone...@verizon.net
wrote:
Hello,
How the inherited attributes are entered in components? I couldn't
find
any information. I modified some preexisting component and then
entered
new name, footprint etc. If
On 04/07/2011 04:52 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
PCB layer groups may be used here. Put the short on an extra layer, in
an extra group. At checkout time, you can assign the extra layer to the
group representing the copper layer that needs shorting. This is
probably a single char in the PCB
rickman gnuarm.g...@arius.com writes:
I have to say I am philosophically opposed to any feature that allows
a design to pass DRC when the layout differs from the schematic.
Just to get the terminology right:
DRC has no business to care about the schematics at all. There shall be
a tool to
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com writes:
On 04/07/2011 04:52 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
PCB layer groups may be used here. Put the short on an extra layer, in
an extra group. At checkout time, you can assign the extra layer to the
group representing the copper layer that needs shorting.
Out of curiosity, how do other PCB layout products (Altium, Orcad,
etc.) implement this? Follow by example?
On 7 April 2011 18:21, Stephan Boettcher
[1]boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de wrote:
John Griessen [2]j...@ecosensory.com writes:
On 04/07/2011 04:52 AM, Stephan Boettcher
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:21:00PM +0200, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
As soon as we have the option to define arbitary layer types, we also
need to be able to define arbitrary DRC rules. The star-point may be a
footprint with a structure on some non-conductive shorts layer, which
will need to be
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:59:12PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
I have also done a feature request for this patch at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/753643.
Hope, some of you like this feature, too and hope to get it accepted.
Pushed with changed patch title (added gtk/hid). Thanks!
--
Am 07.04.2011 21:35, schrieb Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:59:12PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
I have also done a feature request for this patch at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/753643.
Hope, some of you like this feature, too and hope to get it accepted.
Pushed
Hi:
El 06/04/11 16:42, John Doty escribió:
On Apr 6, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 4/6/11 3:01 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Specifically, the suite misses a way for fast turnaround of schematic
modification, simulation and display.
make
Exactly.
Especially for
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
Hi:
El 06/04/11 16:42, John Doty escribió:
This is one place where gEDA's modular toolkit approach really shines. It
saves me an enormous amount of time relative to the more integrated tools I
once used. One really nice thing about
2011/4/7 Rubén Gómez Antolí l...@mucharuina.com:
Hi:
El 06/04/11 16:42, John Doty escribió:
On Apr 6, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 4/6/11 3:01 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Specifically, the suite misses a way for fast turnaround of schematic
modification, simulation and
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:00 -0600, John Doty wrote:
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
You are right but, what about the users?
I *am* a user. gEDA is software that caters to the needs of users. But
it's not for passive *consumers* of software. There are plenty of
Hi again:
El 08/04/11 01:30, Peter Clifton escribió:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:00 -0600, John Doty wrote:
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
You are right but, what about the users?
I *am* a user.
I'm too.
gEDA is software that caters to the needs of users. But
it's
22 matches
Mail list logo
