Rob Butts wrote:
> I realize I have to verify all of the footprints but I'm just wondering what
> everybody uses.
I use exclusively the footprints from my section at gedasymbols.org.
Specifically:
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/footprints/generic/SO8.fp
http://www.gedasymbols.o
Thomas Oldbury wrote:
> Now I want to make certain that it will use the current directory I am
> using: /usr/share/pcb, and not /usr/local/share/pcb. How can I make it do
> this?
IMHO, there is no need to set this at compile time.
You can configure your preferred library path(s) in
File -> Pre
Thank you!
That did it.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, DJ Delorie <[1]d...@delorie.com> wrote:
You have to remove the 'T' line just before the text too
___
geda-user mailing list
[2]geda-user@moria.seul.org
[3]http://www.seu
You have to remove the 'T' line just before the text too
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
I removed that line from the text and now I'm see "N 55500 45200 53300
45200 4" on the schematic where the U9 was. Should I just select that
text in the schematic and delete it? I don't feel comfortable doing
that. Are all those lines between what appears to be two capacitor
state
Mark Rages writes:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Rob Butts wrote:
>> Having never looked at a schematic this way I wouldn't know what to
>> look for but from this excerpt can you tell if this is just a stray
>> refdes that doesn't belong? It is the only U9 found.
>
>
> Right, looks l
Will do!
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Mark Rages <[1]markra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Rob Butts <[2]r.but...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Having never looked at a schematic this way I wouldn't know what to
> look for but from this excerpt can you te
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Rob Butts wrote:
> Having never looked at a schematic this way I wouldn't know what to
> look for but from this excerpt can you tell if this is just a stray
> refdes that doesn't belong? It is the only U9 found.
Right, looks like stray text. You can dele
Having never looked at a schematic this way I wouldn't know what to
look for but from this excerpt can you tell if this is just a stray
refdes that doesn't belong? It is the only U9 found.
C 50600 46200 1 0 0 input-2.sym
{
T 50700 46200 5 10 1 1 0 0 1
net=_Clk
T 51200 46900
Last time I built PCB, I screwed up and made several footprint
directories and different tools seemed to use different ones.
Now I want to make certain that it will use the current directory I am
using: /usr/share/pcb, and not /usr/local/share/pcb. How can I make it
do this?
__
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Rob Butts wrote:
> After entering a schematic and autonumbering it I have what seems to be
> an extra refdes text in the schematic that doesn't have a symbol that
> it goes with. I suspect it is from another symbol that I deleted that
> the refdes might ha
After entering a schematic and autonumbering it I have what seems to be
an extra refdes text in the schematic that doesn't have a symbol that
it goes with. I suspect it is from another symbol that I deleted that
the refdes might have been separated while dragging and dropping
compon
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Oldbury <[1]toldb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
SO8, SO16
On 29 April 2011 20:01, Rob Butts <[1][2]r.but...@gmail.com> wrote:
Can someone tell me what is the corresponding footprint when a
datasheet lists a footprint a
[sorry, pressed Send too soon]
SOx are the normal ones - 150 mil wide for most low pin count and 200
mil wide for others (>18 pins?)
SOxM is 200mil wide. It fits 8 pin 208mil DataFlash chips.
I've not used SOxW yet.
On 29 April 2011 20:08, Thomas Oldbury <[1]toldb...@gmail.com> w
SO8, SO16
On 29 April 2011 20:01, Rob Butts <[1]r.but...@gmail.com> wrote:
Can someone tell me what is the corresponding footprint when a
datasheet lists a footprint as SOIC-8, SOIC-14 and SOIC-16? In
PCB I
see SOxx with differing widths and SOJxx_xxx with a slew
Can someone tell me what is the corresponding footprint when a
datasheet lists a footprint as SOIC-8, SOIC-14 and SOIC-16? In PCB I
see SOxx with differing widths and SOJxx_xxx with a slew of varying
widths.
I realize I have to verify all of the footprints but I'm just wondering
Am 29.04.2011 um 08:47 schrieb Alberto Maccioni:
... but it broke the "minimum distance" path optimization,
This was fixed the day you mentioned it. Perhaps a day later :-)
Probably you didn't notice that it is still boken, as I wrote again.
Probably we won't agree on that ever. The patch
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:24 -0300, Daniel B. wrote:
> Hi geda-user@
>
> The LM337 symbol (lm337-1.sym) has a wrong pinout.
Seems that LM337 symbol shipped with geda has no associated footprint,
so we can not definitely say that pinout is wrong. It may be better to
say that pinnumbers do not match
18 matches
Mail list logo
