Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 13:42 +0200 schrieb Bernd Jendrissek:
My abstract-symbols branch makes this more manageable, IMHO. You edit
the part side of the component to carry the right part name, not the
symbol side, which is just a generic NAND gate. I've attached an
example that you
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Stefan Salewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many symbols shipped with gEDA/gschem use simple text to display the
name of the device, i.e. MAX232 or 7404.
Tragesym does this too -- so I did this for my own symbols.
But is this really a good choice?
I think there
Many symbols shipped with gEDA/gschem use simple text to display the
name of the device, i.e. MAX232 or 7404.
Tragesym does this too -- so I did this for my own symbols.
But is this really a good choice?
I think there are at least three disadvantages:
1. If I use a logic symbol like 7404 I may
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Stefan Salewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many symbols shipped with gEDA/gschem use simple text to display the
name of the device, i.e. MAX232 or 7404.
Tragesym does this too -- so I did this for my own symbols.
But is this really a good choice?
I think there
4 matches
Mail list logo
