Re: gEDA-user: numslots=0

2011-02-08 Thread John Doty
On Feb 4, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: Another cite from the master attribute list: A basic problem is that the master attribute list, symbol creation guide, and gsymcheck all represent a much narrower vision than the actual breadth of the gEDA application space. A symbol

Re: gEDA-user: numslots=0

2011-02-06 Thread Vladimir Zhbanov
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 05:07:06AM +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: Another cite from the master attribute list: /-- numslots=# should exist somewhere in the symbol and be made invisible. This is a free standing or floating attribute. If the symbol does not need slotting,

Re: gEDA-user: numslots=0

2011-02-06 Thread Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 08:47:05PM +0300, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 05:07:06AM +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: The master attribute list explicitly requires all symbols to contain an numslots attribute, even if slotting does not apply at all. IIRC, gnetlist does not

Re: gEDA-user: numslots=0

2011-02-06 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: This affects also the 'Symbol Creation Howto' and the gsymcheck symbol checker itself. ack. These are supposed to track the contents of the master attributes list. So yes, gsymcheck needs to be changed in unison. Would you like to change gsymcheck behaviour (that

gEDA-user: numslots=0

2011-02-04 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Another cite from the master attribute list: /-- numslots=# should exist somewhere in the symbol and be made invisible. This is a free standing or floating attribute. If the symbol does not need slotting, then put numslots=0 into the symbol file. \-- Why