Well the problem is with whatever generates the net list.
unnamed_net5R1-1 C3-2 U2-J2_2
Vcc U3-3 C2-2 U1-40
unnamed_net4U2-J1_2 U1-36
unnamed_net3U2-J1_1 U1-35
unnamed_net2U2-J2_3 U1-34
unnamed_net1U2-J2_4 U1-33
+3.3V U3-1 C3-1 C2-1 C1-2 U2-J1_9 U2-J1_10 U2-J1_13
In case anyone is interested, here's the entire schematic:
http://fayettedigital.com/images/sch2.jpg
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:50 -0500, Jim wrote:
In case anyone is interested, here's the entire schematic:
http://fayettedigital.com/images/sch2.jpg
Sorry, can not really help you.
(For the experts it may be easier if you make all data files available,
not only pictures.)
What I do in such
Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:50 -0500, Jim wrote:
In case anyone is interested, here's the entire schematic:
http://fayettedigital.com/images/sch2.jpg
Sorry, can not really help you.
(For the experts it may be easier if you make all data files available,
not only
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 20:29 -0500, Jim wrote:
So is this supposed to be element U102-J1 's pin 1, or is the
element U102 's pin J1-1.
The point is that we chose to use - as a name/number separator. It is
reasonable to choose a single reserved character for that purpose in a
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:28 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:40:54 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Perhaps the pin identifier U102-J1-1 is causing issues.
So this may be another incarnation of the hyphen-nastiness? Would it be
possible to fix this tendency to
Jim wrote:
When I do an optimize rats nest I don't see anything but I do get a
bunch of errors in the log like this:
Snip
Thank you one and all. I took Stefan's generated footprint, massaged
the pin numbers and got the following working footprint!
Element[ WIZ812MJ mod. WIZ812MJ 0 0
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:28 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:40:54 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Perhaps the pin identifier U102-J1-1 is causing issues.
So this may be another incarnation of the hyphen-nastiness? Would
it be
possible
Harry Eaton wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:28 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:40:54 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Perhaps the pin identifier U102-J1-1 is causing issues.
So this may be another incarnation of the hyphen-nastiness? Would
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:42 -0500, Jim wrote:
Perhaps the pin identifier U102-J1-1 is causing issues.
Thanks everyone. I think I understand the issues. I'll just go with
pin numbers 1-40 and drop the J1 and J2 mess. It won't match the part,
but I can
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 09:41 -0500, Jim wrote:
dpkg -l | grep -i geda
ii geda
1:1.4.0.1 GPL EDA --
So I presume Debian or Ubuntu?
I expect if you grab gEDA 1.6.1 from either
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:55 -0500, Jim wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:27 -0500, Jim wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
This is the only part of the file (board.pcb) that mentions the
footprint and/or the pins.
Element(0x0 Wiz812mj.fp
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 07:47 -0500, Jim wrote:
I'm running 8.04 LTS on my main system. I got burnt when they dropped
support on a non LTS system. I don't have time to upgrade every few
months. I do run openvz and can probably install most any distro. I
have jaunty running on a container
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:40:54 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Perhaps the pin identifier U102-J1-1 is causing issues.
So this may be another incarnation of the hyphen-nastiness? Would it be
possible to fix this tendency to misinterpret hyphens in names once and
for all?
---(kaimartin)---
--
When I do an optimize rats nest I don't see anything but I do get a
bunch of errors in the log like this:
Can't find U102 pin J1-13 called for in netlist.
Can't find U102 pin J1-8 called for in netlist.
Can't find U102 pin J1-9 called for in netlist.
Can't find U102 pin J1-10 called for in
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 05:01 -0500, Jim wrote:
When I do an optimize rats nest I don't see anything but I do get a
bunch of errors in the log like this:
Can't find U102 pin J1-13 called for in netlist.
Can't find U102 pin J1-8 called for in netlist.
Can't find U102 pin J1-9 called for in
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 05:01 -0500, Jim wrote:
When I do an optimize rats nest I don't see anything but I do get a
bunch of errors in the log like this:
Can't find U102 pin J1-13 called for in netlist.
Can't find U102 pin J1-8 called for in netlist.
Can't find U102 pin
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:27 -0500, Jim wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
This is the only part of the file (board.pcb) that mentions the
footprint and/or the pins.
Element(0x0 Wiz812mj.fp U102 unknown 10 10 3 100 0x0)
(
Pin(310 -450 60 28 J1-1 0x101)
Pin(310 350 60 28 J2-1 0x101)
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:27 -0500, Jim wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
This is the only part of the file (board.pcb) that mentions the
footprint and/or the pins.
Element(0x0 Wiz812mj.fp U102 unknown 10 10 3 100 0x0)
(
Pin(310 -450 60 28 J1-1 0x101)
Pin(310 350 60
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:55 -0500, Jim wrote:
So I thought maybe the Element line wasn't right since it looks
different from yours, so I changed it to
Element( Wiz812mj.fp U102 unknown 10 10 3 100 0 100 )
And now it fails on line 74.
I'm getting more confused by the minute.
There
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 09:41 -0500, Jim wrote:
Do you know where the definitive description of the footprint file can
be found? It's not land_patterns_20050129.pdf which is what googling
wanted me to believe.
Thanks,
Jim.
Land_pattern_xxx is right, see link at bottom of this
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 09:41 -0500, Jim wrote:
Do you know where the definitive description of the footprint file can
be found? It's not land_patterns_20050129.pdf which is what googling
wanted me to believe.
evince /usr/share/doc/pcb/pcb.pdf.gz
Section 8, on file formats.
--
Peter
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:17 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 09:41 -0500, Jim wrote:
Do you know where the definitive description of the footprint file can
be found? It's not land_patterns_20050129.pdf which is what googling
wanted me to believe.
evince
Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 09:41 -0500, Jim wrote:
Do you know where the definitive description of the footprint file can
be found? It's not land_patterns_20050129.pdf which is what googling
wanted me to believe.
Thanks,
Jim.
Land_pattern_xxx is right, see
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 11:06 -0500, Jim wrote:
Land_pattern_xxx is right, see link at bottom of this page:
http://www.ssalewski.de/SFG.html.en
I think I followed that pattern but it didn't work. I see you have a
generator can it do a 4 row DIP?
Something with a foot print like:
One might rationally assume the action ChangePinName does indeed
change the pin name, not its label. (Yet n on an object changes the
label).
Pins have names and numbers, not names and labels.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 11:35 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
One might rationally assume the action ChangePinName does indeed
change the pin name, not its label. (Yet n on an object changes the
label).
Pins have names and numbers, not names and labels.
Bah - forgot the terminology. Still - for
Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 11:06 -0500, Jim wrote:
Land_pattern_xxx is right, see link at bottom of this page:
http://www.ssalewski.de/SFG.html.en
I think I followed that pattern but it didn't work. I see you have a
generator can it do a 4 row DIP?
Something
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:05 -0500, Jim wrote:
Thanks for the offer, I'll take a shot at creating the FP the way you
suggested. I need to learn the tool anyway.
Yes, this is the best method, if time is not a restriction.
The only problem may occur if you have no ruby interpreter
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Pin[-45000 -45000 5118 2000 6318 3937 1 1 square]
snip
Pin[-35000 -45000 5118 2000 6318 3937 1 1 square]
This part could not be netlisted.
Chould the pins be named J1-1 through J1-20 and J2-1 through J2-20...
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:17 -0800, Steven Michalske wrote:
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Pin[-45000 -45000 5118 2000 6318 3937 1 1 square]
snip
Pin[-35000 -45000 5118 2000 6318 3937 1 1 square]
This part could not be netlisted.
Chould the
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 08:55 -0500, Jim wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:27 -0500, Jim wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
This is the only part of the file (board.pcb) that mentions the
footprint and/or the pins.
Element(0x0 Wiz812mj.fp U102 unknown 10 10 3 100 0x0)
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 09:41 -0500, Jim wrote:
dpkg -l | grep -i geda
ii geda
1:1.4.0.1 GPL EDA --
So I presume Debian or Ubuntu?
I expect if you grab gEDA 1.6.1 from either the Debian sid repositories,
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 21:23 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:17 -0800, Steven Michalske wrote:
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Pin[-45000 -45000 5118 2000 6318 3937 1 1 square]
snip
Pin[-35000 -45000 5118 2000 6318 3937 1 1
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 21:23 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:17 -0800, Steven Michalske wrote:
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Pin[-45000 -45000 5118 2000 6318 3937 1 1 square]
snip
Pin[-35000 -45000 5118 2000
Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:05 -0500, Jim wrote:
It's probably one of a kind. Not worth the trouble I don't think. The
datasheet is here
http://www.vintagecomputercables.com/datasheet/WIZ812MJ%20Datasheet_V_1.1.pdf
It's not something everyone would mount on a PCB.
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:42 -0500, Jim wrote:
Perhaps the pin identifier U102-J1-1 is causing issues.
Thanks everyone. I think I understand the issues. I'll just go with
pin numbers 1-40 and drop the J1 and J2 mess. It won't match the part,
but I can translate easy enough. There
37 matches
Mail list logo
