> > Would anyone be opposed to having the netlister assume a :1 for net=
> > attributes without a colon?
> There was a patch for this available, but it did not make it in the
> official code.
I would love it if I didn't need the :1 on netlist names. Right now I
do not have :1 on my net names, and
On Jun 11, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
>> Would anyone be opposed to having the netlister assume a :1 for net=
>> attributes without a colon?
>
> There was a patch for this available, but it did not make it in the
> official code.
There is a confusing collection of ways a one pin
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 21:18 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> There was a patch for this available, but it did not make it in the
> official code.
>
>
See
http://www.geda.seul.org/mailinglist/geda-user137/msg00098.html
___
geda-user mailing lis
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:47 -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
> In http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:scg, referring to the "device=" attribute:
>
> > This attribute should not be used as a label. Use a separate text object
> > for the label.
>
> What is the reasoning behind this? This is pointless redundan
In http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:scg, referring to the "device=" attribute:
> This attribute should not be used as a label. Use a separate text object for
>the label.
What is the reasoning behind this? This is pointless redundancy.
And it makes using "light" symbols harder, because you need di
5 matches
Mail list logo
