On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 05:45:14PM -0500, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:42:48PM -0500, Marvin Dickens wrote:
> > I realize that this is probably not going to popular with everybody,
> > but it would be nice if all of the tools that require a gui were built
> > using the same libra
> BTW: What sizes of holes are in use in US?
If you google for "wire size drills" you're likely to find the right
list. However, 4pcb at least has filler sizes, and can do pretty much
any size - they claim.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:14:35PM -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2005, at 8:27 PM, Bert Douglas wrote:
> >>>Motif is, as well as Xaw, X11 Toolkit based, but as a comercial
> >>>product lots of people prefer something free.
> >>
> >> Lesstif.
> >
> >Motif is now open.
> >http://www.openg
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 07:54:51PM -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> This has been my experience as well. C++ is a horrid abortion, in my
> opinion. C++ code that's truly portable isn't very common.
And it isn't even all that hard to get it reasonably portable. It's
just less likely to be perfec
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:42:48PM -0500, Marvin Dickens wrote:
> I realize that this is probably not going to popular with everybody,
> but it would be nice if all of the tools that require a gui were built
> using the same library. Preferably, one that ports really easily.
> It seems to me that Q
Hello,
it seems that the component 4538 have a bug when you put a slot
attribute: the pins numbers become wrong. I join the right symbol file.
If there is someone update the library, it would be nice.
Cordially.
--
Sur http://www.iznogood-factory.org , vous avez parmi des
doc techniques en fra
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:36:57 -0800 (PST), Kenneth Long
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > which I do have:
> > bash-2.05b# find / -name gdk-pixbuf.h -print
> > /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf.h
>
> You have gdk-pixbuf as included in GTK+ 2.x. I
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:36:57 -0800 (PST), Kenneth Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> which I do have:
> bash-2.05b# find / -name gdk-pixbuf.h -print
> /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf.h
[...]
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
> -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2
> -I/usr/lib/g
cool. I'll try that when I get home from work
tonight.
thanks for your help!
Ken
--- Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to recall that gerbv recently came out wiht a
> 1.0 release,
> which apparently took care of a lot of bugs. The
> version on the CDROM
> is 0.16. Perhaps you
cool. I'll try that when I get home from work
tonight.
thanks for your help!
Ken
--- Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to recall that gerbv recently came out wiht a
> 1.0 release,
> which apparently took care of a lot of bugs. The
> version on the CDROM
> is 0.16. Perhaps you
cool. I'll try that when I get home from work
tonight.
thanks for your help!
Ken
--- Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to recall that gerbv recently came out wiht a
> 1.0 release,
> which apparently took care of a lot of bugs. The
> version on the CDROM
> is 0.16. Perhaps you
I seem to recall that gerbv recently came out wiht a 1.0 release,
which apparently took care of a lot of bugs. The version on the CDROM
is 0.16. Perhaps you can get the latest off the web & build it?
You must have a very new gcc; I understand that the newest gcc has
played havoc on my CD ROM dist
the drama continues. :-)
Okay, irregardless of the libreadline gnucap is
complete.
The next error occurs on installing gerbv.
an issue with exportimage.c and a header,
gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf.h
which I do have:
bash-2.05b# find / -name gdk-pixbuf.h -print
/usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbu
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:27:21 -0500 (EST), Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On the other hand, Mac's OSX was built upon BSD in only -- what? --
> two years.
Heh. Make sure you don't mention that to any NeXT people... OS X
evolved from NeXTStep, which took well over two years to develop.
Does anyone know if there is such a program, or a path of programs,
which can transform Verilog Netlist to DEF format?
Ming
argh. I have two libreadline now. Dont think that is
very smart?
/usr/local/lib:
libreadline.so.4 -> libreadline.so.4.3
and
/lib:
libreadline.so.4 -> libreadline.so.4.3
--- Kenneth Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just manually installing readline-4.3.tar.gz
> from the
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:47:37 +0100
"Dan McMahill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've made a new snapshot for pcb. The snapshot may be found at
> http://pcb.sf.net
Thank you very much for the snapshot. It's great work.
I'm still missing the lack of removal of dead polygons and rectangulars.
Lev
I'm just manually installing readline-4.3.tar.gz
from the cdrom... then running installer.exe
I still have the other two libs installed through
emerge.
libedit does not seem to provide 100% of libreadline.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find
I did a emerge of both libs on gentoo..
bash-2.05b# emerge libedit
bash-2.05b# emerge libtermcap
readline is suppose to be in libedit.
Is that enough or am I better off manually installing
from cdrom readline-4.3.tar.gz
I like to keep as many parts emerged as possible.
I'm compiling now... bu
> > Shold the specified diametr be the drill size or finished hole size?
>
> My fab shop says drill sized are ALWAYS finished size. Only the fab
> shop knows how thick their plating is.
So the footprint creation guide should contain a notice that:
1) symbols submited to pcb should have diametr of
http://www.centos.org/
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:50:50 +, Evan Lavelle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Mozilla's given up on threading, so new subject]
>
> Stuart Brorson wrote:
> >>>Anyway, when a company wants to run a copy of RHEL, they are likely to
> >>>also want the support & quality assura
On Friday 28 January 2005 07:04 am, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> I can't speak about which of libtermcap or
> libreadline is "better".
You need both. libreadline requires libtermcap.
Stuart Brorson wrote:
The reason Apple could do this is that they acutally have revenue, and
can therefore support great developers to work on their products
full-time. *That's* what Linux lacks right now -- a self-sustaining
business model.
Finally, I'll point out that Red Hat finally became prof
DJ Delorie wrote:
But RHEL costs ~$800 - $2500 *per year* for usable versions. If that's
not "screwing your customers for profit", then I don't know what is.
Most of that cost is for 24/7 phone support, which our customers feel
is a reasonable price for what they get. Note: the way our company
w
I've made a new snapshot for pcb. The snapshot may be found at
http://pcb.sf.net
As always, this is a snapshot of a work in progress. There have been
many bug fixes and feature additions and as always there is still more
to do. Thanks to everyone who has provided feedback. A summary of the
chang
> Stuart (who is asking in ignorance about what's acutally on RHEL. . . .)
The whole point of RHEL is that it's guaranteed stable for 5 years or
so, so that customers don't have the issue of upgrade
incompatibilities every few months or end-of-life every year or twoo.
The software is slightly old
> But RHEL costs ~$800 - $2500 *per year* for usable versions. If that's
> not "screwing your customers for profit", then I don't know what is. I
> have no problem with profit, but this model doesn't make sense. I would
> happily pay a few hundred $ for a stable professionally-supported and
> d
> I am receiving mails from PCB CVS with the text "set version for
> snapshot". Thats because a new snapshot is near? Is it possible to
> say to us (users) whats new, and so on?
Dan mentioned it was time for a new snapshot. He might be working on
it.
> Sorry if I am too curious, but I am a PCB
> "White Box Enterprise Linux 3.0"
Yeah, that's the one I was thinking of.
> But RHEL costs ~$800 - $2500 *per year* for usable versions. If that's
> not "screwing your customers for profit", then I don't know what is.
Most of that cost is for 24/7 phone support, which our customers feel
is a reasonable price for what they get. Note: the way our company
works, your qu
I am receiving mails from PCB CVS with the text "set version for snapshot".
Thats because a new snapshot is near? Is it possible to say to us (users)
whats new, and so on?
Sorry if I am too curious, but I am a PCB fan and the latest snapshot had very
good improvements but a lot of unstability, s
FWIW, the libreadline tarball is on the CD, so you don't need to go
looking for it. I can't speak about which of libtermcap or
libreadline is "better".
Stuart
>
> looks like I'm missing another dependancy..
> seeing if libedit will work.
>
> which is "better" libtermcap or libreadline?
>
>
> BTW, if anyone has a link to the stripped-out version, I'd appreciate
> it. I spent some time looking a couple of months ago and found nothing.
>
> Evan
Wine (Ms Windows emulator) is packaged for "White Box Enterprise Linux 3.0"
which is claimed to be RHEL compatible
(see: http://www.winehq.c
[Mozilla's given up on threading, so new subject]
Stuart Brorson wrote:
Anyway, when a company wants to run a copy of RHEL, they are likely to
also want the support & quality assurance that comes with the real
McCoy; they are accordingly willing to pay. And the advantage of
GPL'ed software in this
Another use is this:
Imagine your company does not use Linux at all. A vendor of proprietry
software you use is offering a Linux version of their software, and
allowing you to trial it against their Windows version. However, they
*only* support RHEL. To fairly test this software you either have
On Friday 28 January 2005 02:22 am, Kenneth Long wrote:
> looks like I'm missing another dependancy..
> seeing if libedit will work.
>
> which is "better" libtermcap or libreadline?
> libedit seems to have libreadline.
>
> Ken
>
>
> bash-2.05b$ ./configure
> Configuring gnucap using --prefix=/usr
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 02:02:54 +0100
"Kenneth Long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get a weird response when I execute direct:
> I'm root and execute permissions are on the
> program "installer.exe".
>
> bash-2.05b# /mnt/cdrom0/installer.exe --log --verbose
> bash: /mnt/cdrom0/installer.exe: Permi
37 matches
Mail list logo
