On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 19:07 -0600, David Hart wrote:
> Though not a GNU project, the JHDL Project is an OpenSource project.
> >From their web site at:
>
> http://www.jhdl.org/overview.html
>
> there is this short teaser about JHDL:
>
> Simply put, JHDL is a structurally based Hardwar
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:32:41PM +0100, antonio bergnoli wrote:
> Darrel Harmon wrote:
> >
> >In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
> >of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
> >modifications without having to install non free sofware.
> >
>
>
Darrel Harmon wrote:
In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
modifications without having to install non free sofware.
Do you mean that you have a complete toolchain to play with DSP under
Linux ? Or do
On 11/5/05, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But GPL is not about open source. GPL is about free software. Those
> are two different philosophies. Read their definition.
Yes, please do. At least as of GPL 2.0, the GPL *mandates* that
source code be available for software at nominal cost
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:10:40PM -0800, Stephen Meier wrote:
> I have to agree. Open Source, in my opinion, is not about taking the
> work of others without their consent. Open source is about authors
> deciding to share, not about theft. If you don't like the license of a
> piece of code, the
I have to agree. Open Source, in my opinion, is not about taking the
work of others without their consent. Open source is about authors
deciding to share, not about theft. If you don't like the license of a
piece of code, then don't use the code. It is not ethical to ignore the
restrictions. If
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 11:22, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Darrell Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights.
>
> That is your opinion. Others have the right to disagree.
>
> Can we take this off-list, please?
>
> MS
Hello list,
It's been a while sin
> Darrell Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights.
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 11:22 am, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> That is your opinion. Others have the right to disagree.
>
> Can we take this off-list, please?
Illegal use of proprietary software i
On Nov 2, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights.
That is your opinion. Others have the right to disagree.
Can we take this off-list, please?
Speaking of which...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire"You'll have to be a lot more sp
Darrell Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights.
That is your opinion. Others have the right to disagree.
Can we take this off-list, please?
MS
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Kov=E1cs?= Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing is that from Altera, you CAN download code for Windows, but
> not for linux.
As I've said, I've got mine through some social engineering.
> Can you make a copy, and send it to me? :-)
Yes, of course! I offer free copies t
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 November 2005 05:32 pm, Dan McMahill wrote:
> > > In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
> > > of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
> > > modifications without having to insta
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:07:05PM -0600, David Hart wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 16:52 -0500, Darrell Harmon wrote:
>
> Though not a GNU project, the JHDL Project is an OpenSource project.
> >From their web site at:
>
> http://www.jhdl.org/overview.html
>
> there is this short teaser abou
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 05:32 pm, Dan McMahill wrote:
> > In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
> > of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
> > modifications without having to install non free sofware.
>
> Out of curiosity, which DSP chip can
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 16:52 -0500, Darrell Harmon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:26:21PM +0100, Kov?cs Levente wrote:
> > Anyways... I have not yet decided which to use... I'd like to pay the
> > least. Poor guy from a technical university.
> >
> > Levente
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:32:20PM -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
>
> >In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
> >of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
> >modifications without having to install non free sofware.
> >
>
> Out of curiosity, which DSP
> > In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
> > of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
> > modifications without having to install non free sofware.
> >
>
> Out of curiosity, which DSP chip can be programmed with free (open
> source or otherwise
In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
modifications without having to install non free sofware.
Out of curiosity, which DSP chip can be programmed with free (open
source or otherwise) software? I st
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:26:21PM +0100, Kov?cs Levente wrote:
> Anyways... I have not yet decided which to use... I'd like to pay the
> least. Poor guy from a technical university.
>
> Levente
>
> --
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AIM: ha5ogl
> ICQ: 48710903
> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yahoo!: k
>somewhat difficult to get working , and is a slow pig.
Well.. 300Mb is the size of Quartus... One would not expect that it's
so called light weight...
> I will never, ever, ever use Xilinx again. They have lost my
> business. It'll be all Altera from here forward. Altera's Quartus
> software i
Hi All,
Thanx for the hints on FPGAs! Good news that the Xilinx' ISE works with
Debian (which I use).
Good bye for now!
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: ha5ogl
ICQ: 48710903
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo!: kieg_tk16
Home Page: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs
Public key: http://web.interware.hu
From: antonio bergnoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: fpga
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:20:47 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> in xilinx ise webpack the Gui (project navigator) is not mandatory.
> you can use command line tools as well as is depicted in xilinx u
in xilinx ise webpack the Gui (project navigator) is not mandatory.
you can use command line tools as well as is depicted in xilinx user guide.
--
Antonio Bergnoli
INFN Sez Padova
Via Marzolo n.8
35131 Padova ITALY
Tel +39 049 827 7093
Cell +39 328 232 8803
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME C
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 02:51:41PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > > You will need Motif from non-free.
> >
> > Is that what libXm.so.3 is?
>
> In Fedora, you'd want the lesstif package. Xm is the X windows Motif
> GUI library. Lesstif is an open source clone of Motif. There's an
> "OpenMotif"
From: Kovács Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gEDA-user: fpga
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:09:13 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey all,
>
> Can someone point me some article about FPGA programming on Linux. I
> mean... from design to uploading the code to the FPGA. What tools are
> ava
On Oct 28, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
The Linux version is quite usable, you just have to give up your
citizenship
in copyrighting nations and become a citizen of a country whose
constitution prohibits intellectual property and other forms of slavery
and encourages and empowers its
> > You will need Motif from non-free.
>
> Is that what libXm.so.3 is?
In Fedora, you'd want the lesstif package. Xm is the X windows Motif
GUI library. Lesstif is an open source clone of Motif. There's an
"OpenMotif" package too, but that's the window manager.
Michael Sokolov was moderated on the classiccmp mailing list for this
kind of posts. Here is the letter by the classiccmp moderator,
http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2005-October/205517.html
vax, 9000
Darrell Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also use Xilinx ISE Webpack. Xilinx only supports it
> on RHEL, but it works alright on debian.
The Xilinx ISE Webpack is the worst crock of $hit I have ever seen.
They've done everything they could to make it impossible to install and
use. The distr
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:17:43PM +0200, antonio bergnoli wrote:
> there are very good tools pertaining this task.
> i use dayly this great software:
>
> - Emacs + vhdl mode + speedbar ( as editor and code browser); [GPL]
> - ghdl as vhdl simulator; (Great!!) [GPL]
> - gtkwave as wave viewer; [
Hello,
For verilog synthesis and simulation you can use icarus verilog
(iverilog). It's a small, easy to use and fast tool. It's available as a
debian package in the standard distributions. I have found verilog's
syntax more friendly than vhdl's syntax.
For verilog syntax highlighting I have tried
Hey,
Thanks for the quick answer!
> you have to spend a week reading documentation but at the end you'll
> have a complete FPGA devel system running over linux
Yes, that's OKAY.
Thanks...
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: ha5ogl
ICQ: 48710903
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo!: kieg_tk16
Home Pag
there are very good tools pertaining this task.
i use dayly this great software:
- Emacs + vhdl mode + speedbar ( as editor and code browser); [GPL]
- ghdl as vhdl simulator; (Great!!) [GPL]
- gtkwave as wave viewer; [GPL]
- xilinx ise webpack as synthesys , place an route an porgramming tools
33 matches
Mail list logo
