On 12/13/13 14:08, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 06:43:25 +0200, Niko Sauer wrote:
>
>>> Let me try to explain. In the code snippet above, the two conditionals
>>> build a logical AND, so that in order to build with LCMS2, both
>>> HAVE_LCMS and HAVE_LCMS2 must be defined. If HAVE
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 06:43:25 +0200, Niko Sauer wrote:
> > Let me try to explain. In the code snippet above, the two conditionals
> > build a logical AND, so that in order to build with LCMS2, both
> > HAVE_LCMS and HAVE_LCMS2 must be defined. If HAVE_LCMS were undefined,
> > the HAVE_LCMS2 conditi
On 12/12/13 11:07, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:34:54 +0200, Niko Sauer wrote:
>
> Which line have you deleted? There's a bug in the patch, because HAVE_LCMS
> is undefined, and that leads to some files (such as exif_common.c) not
> including lcms2.h and breaking c
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:34:54 +0200, Niko Sauer wrote:
> >>> Which line have you deleted? There's a bug in the patch, because HAVE_LCMS
> >>> is undefined, and that leads to some files (such as exif_common.c) not
> >>> including lcms2.h and breaking compilation.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It is line 296 whic
On 12/11/13 12:06, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:47:40 +0200, Niko Sauer wrote:
>
>> On 12/09/13 19:43, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 03:20:53 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
>>>
Niko: do you know if render speed is affected?
>>>
>>> It appears to be visibly
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:47:40 +0200, Niko Sauer wrote:
> On 12/09/13 19:43, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 03:20:53 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
> >
> >> Niko: do you know if render speed is affected?
> >
> > It appears to be visibly faster here.
> >
> >> ISTR that render speed
> >
On 12/09/13 19:43, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 03:20:53 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
>
>> Niko: do you know if render speed is affected?
>
> It appears to be visibly faster here.
>
>> ISTR that render speed
>> was one downside to LCMS2, but that may have changed since I last hea
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 03:20:53 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
> Niko: do you know if render speed is affected?
It appears to be visibly faster here.
> ISTR that render speed
> was one downside to LCMS2, but that may have changed since I last heard
> that, and also it might not be significant (I ha
Dear Omari
I could not detect a change of speed in Geeqie. The version of lcms2 I
have on my system is 2.3. The system is "Beyond Linux From Scratch"
based on Linux-3.3.7. That system has moved on quite a bit and now touts
lcms2-2.5. I think it can only be faster.
I might also add that I re-co
Niko: do you know if render speed is affected? ISTR that render speed
was one downside to LCMS2, but that may have changed since I last heard
that, and also it might not be significant (I haven't used a project
using LCMS2 before).
--xsdg
On 12/05/2013 04:47 AM, Niko Sauer wrote:
> I found a
I found a patch that will enable lcms2 when compiling Geeqie-1.1.This
is Gitorious Commit 1548a68. There is a small bug in the patch that I
remedied by deleting one single line. The new patch is attached. Since
it changes configure.in, one should run autoconf before configuring.
Geeqie's colour r
11 matches
Mail list logo
