Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3699: syscall_emul: [PATCH 18/22] refactor and add functionality for dup, dup2, and pipe

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3699/#review9042 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Tony Gutierrez On Nov. 7, 2016, 2:09 p.m., Brando

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3689: tests, ruby: Move rubytests from ALPHA (linux) to NULL (none)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3689/#review9040 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brad Beckmann On Oct. 27, 2016, 7:50 a.m., Andrea

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3701: syscall_emul: [PATCH 20/22] add the tgkill system call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3701/#review9039 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Tony Gutierrez On Nov. 7, 2016, 2:10 p.m., Brando

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3700: syscall_emul: [PATCH 19/22] adds basic signaling mechanism to SE mode

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3700/#review9038 --- Ship it! src/sim/se_signal.hh (line 5)

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3697: style: [PATCH 16/22] correct some style issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3697/#review9037 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Tony Gutierrez On Nov. 7, 2016, 2:05 p.m., Brando

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3702: syscall_emul: [PATCH 21/22] rewrite code related to system call exits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3702/#review9036 --- src/sim/futex_map.hh (line 5)

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3703: syscall_emul: [PATCH 22/22] ignore system calls that are unimplemented.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3703/#review9035 --- Ship it! This looks ok to me, but could you add more to the description

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3698: syscall_emul: [PATCH 17/22] refactor and add functionality to open syscall family

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3698/#review9034 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Tony Gutierrez On Nov. 7, 2016, 2:07 p.m., Brando

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3681: syscall_emul: [patch 14/22] adds identifier system calls

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3681/#review9033 --- Ship it! src/sim/syscall_emul.cc (line 736)

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3690: x86, ext: fix buf overflow in fp80 ops; pad fp80_t in fputils

> On Nov. 9, 2016, 1:45 p.m., Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > Tested on X86 booting FreeBSD reverting my own simple workaround. > > I can say that gem5 does no longer panic when booting FreeBSD FS with this > > patch applied. > > I cannot say whether it works correctly currently. > > However it improv

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3695: misc: final cleanup of the TLM modules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3695/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2016, 5:07 p.m.) Review request for Default. Repository: gem5

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3693: riscv: [Patch 7/5] Corrected LRSC semantics

> On Nov. 2, 2016, 12:38 p.m., Alec Roelke wrote: > > This doesn't work with the O3 CPU model; I wrote a simple program that > > performs a lr.w followed by sc.w that works with the atomic-simple, > > timing-simple, and minor CPU models, but with the O3 model I get this error: > > > > gem5.deb

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3693: riscv: [Patch 7/5] Corrected LRSC semantics

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3693/#review9030 --- src/arch/riscv/locked_mem.hh (line 72)

[gem5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/HSAIL_X86/tests/opt/quick/se/04.gpu/x86/linux/gpu-ruby-GPU_RfO: CHANGED! * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing-ruby: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello