Ok, I took a look at this, and I think I need to get a little context.
It looks like what you're doing is you have a new type of instruction which
does a memory access which may partially work but which might have a fault
for the other part. Your instruction then needs to react to where the fault
Sure, now worries, it's not on top of our priority list
Many thanks
Giacomo
From: Gabe Black
Sent: 09 August 2019 00:35
To: Giacomo Travaglini ; gem5 Developer List
Subject: Re: Change in gem5/gem5[master]: sim: Add getter to fault virtual
address
Hi
Hi Giacomo, sorry I haven't gotten to this yet, it's on my todo list. If I
don't get to it in a while, feel free to ping me about it.
Gabe
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:09 AM Giacomo Travaglini (Gerrit) <
noreply-gerritcodereview-h9ivfzm1qkbgd9nn-hm...@google.com> wrote:
> Giacomo Travaglini
Giacomo Travaglini has submitted this change. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19176 )
Change subject: sim: Add getter to fault virtual address
..
sim: Add getter to fault virtual address
Change-Id:
Giacomo Travaglini has uploaded a new patch set (#3) to the change
originally created by Giacomo Gabrielli. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19176 )
Change subject: sim: Add getter to fault virtual address
Giacomo Travaglini has uploaded a new patch set (#2) to the change
originally created by Giacomo Gabrielli. (
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19176 )
Change subject: sim: Add getter to fault virtual address
Hello Gabor Dozsa,
I'd like you to do a code review. Please visit
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19176
to review the following change.
Change subject: sim: Add getter to fault virtual address
..
