Hi all,
I'm hoping that we can finalize the new testing framework, and I can push
it in within the next week or so. All of the important changes have at
least one +2, but I want to give everyone one last chance to object or
suggest changes. I've been talking to Sean, and while there's more that
co
Hi Jason, thanks for making sure everybody has a chance to chime in. I
haven't looked at the changes in a while, but I'm also comfortable with
them going in without looking them over again given that other people have
+2-ed them, the high likelihood it will improve on the status quo, and that
we sh
Hi Jason,
Thanks for doing this. I haven't had a chance to look at the code in details
myself, but from what I have seen it looks like a real improvement. Ideally,
I'd like someone from our side (probably Giacomo T) to have a look at it.
However, Giacomo is currently travelling and I have othe
Hi all,
Some more follow up. Sorry that this is going so slowly.
Sean just did a pretty major reworking of the main library. See
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/4421. I'll let him address Andreas's
questions below. I think we're pretty close to having all three.
I would really like to get t
OK, that sounds reasonable. We shouldn't have any issues with that.
I'd like someone from us to have a look as well, most likely Giacomo since I
won't be able to find the time myself. However, don't let that block anything.
Last time I looked at the code, it looked reasonable. I'm sure we can f
Sounds good. We can give it a week or so before we push. I won't have any
time to work on much between now and then anyway.
Cheers,
Jason
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:50 AM Andreas Sandberg
wrote:
> OK, that sounds reasonable. We shouldn't have any issues with that.
>
> I'd like someone from us to
