> On July 14, 2014, 6:36 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > In general, I like the idea of having a proper, architected, page table in
> > SE-mode. Long-term, this could hopefully mean that we can get rid of many
> > of the differences between SE- and FS-mode.
> >
> > High-level comments:
> >
> On July 14, 2014, 5:36 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > In general, I like the idea of having a proper, architected, page table in
> > SE-mode. Long-term, this could hopefully mean that we can get rid of many
> > of the differences between SE- and FS-mode.
> >
> > High-level comments:
> >
> On July 14, 2014, 7:36 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > In general, I like the idea of having a proper, architected, page table in
> > SE-mode. Long-term, this could hopefully mean that we can get rid of many
> > of the differences between SE- and FS-mode.
> >
> > High-level comments:
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2312/#review5188
---
In general, I like the idea of having a proper, architected, page table i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2312/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset 10253
