> I don't see much benefit in doing the split twice (once for page crossings
> and a second time for cache line crossings), though if there was a way to
> isolate the bulk of the code in a single function that gets called twice it
> wouldn't be too bad. There is some merit in only calling the TLB
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:19 PM, nathan binkert wrote:
> >> 2) You split the translation if the address crosses blocks. It seems
> >> that it'd be better to check to see if the access crosses pages, not
> >> blocks to save the extra work.
> >
> > I was told I should use the peer block size becau
>> [ I wrote this e-mail almost a month and a half ago and I just noticed
>> that it never got sent. I think it is still relevant]
>>
>> I've started looking at your patch and in particular some of the
>> translation code in the TimingSimpleCPU. I have a couple of comments.
>>
>> 1) You call dcac
Quoting nathan binkert :
> Hi Gabe,
>
> [ I wrote this e-mail almost a month and a half ago and I just noticed
> that it never got sent. I think it is still relevant]
>
> I've started looking at your patch and in particular some of the
> translation code in the TimingSimpleCPU. I have a couple o
Hi Gabe,
[ I wrote this e-mail almost a month and a half ago and I just noticed
that it never got sent. I think it is still relevant]
I've started looking at your patch and in particular some of the
translation code in the TimingSimpleCPU. I have a couple of comments.
1) You call dcachePort.pe
