> A long time ago we thought about putting a m5/system/ directory where
> we would put architecture dependent code system code (boot loaders, alpha
> console, etc). How do we feel about this? We could move the alpha code in
> there now that HP relicensed it. Additionally, I've got a tiny ARM boot
>
That seems reasonable to me.
This brings up how subprojects are built. Do we make them scons targets
or what? I dealt with that for statetrace by giving it its own makefile,
and I think that's how other things like that were handled (m5term for
instance). Scons is supposed to be so much better tha
A long time ago we thought about putting a m5/system/ directory where
we would put architecture dependent code system code (boot loaders,
alpha console, etc). How do we feel about this? We could move the alpha
code in there now that HP relicensed it. Additionally, I've got a tiny
ARM boot loader