Hello Everyone, I wanna run apk files on gem5 with arm. I don’t have any idea
about that. Any help would be appreciated. Best Regards
___
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
Hi Arun,
My bad the issue is still there
Best regards,
Abhishek
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:57 AM Abhishek Singh <
abhishek.singh199...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> I tested gem5_19 with classic cache x86 with O3CPU, both smt and multicore
> simulations are working
>
> Best regards,
>
> Abh
Hi Arun,
I tested gem5_19 with classic cache x86 with O3CPU, both smt and multicore
simulations are working
Best regards,
Abhishek
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:34 AM Arun Kavumkal
wrote:
> Hi Ciro
> I was debugging the X86, mutlticore issue as suggested by you.
> I could see that the simulation
Hi Ciro
I was debugging the X86, mutlticore issue as suggested by you.
I could see that the simulation exits as expected by changing
* if (activeContexts ==0)*
at
https://github.com/gem5/gem5/blob/9fc9c67b4242c03f165951775be5cd0812f2a705/src/sim/syscall_emul.cc#L212
to *if (activeContexts == 1).*
Hi,
The configuration in source code are not decided depending on any specific
architecture.
One needs to change it depending on what architecture they are targeting.
If you read papers who have used gem5, they always target a particular
architecture (skylake, coffee lake, or any and or arm, etc)
Hello all,
I ran into a question while looking through the `cacheLoadPorts` and
`cacheStorePorts` variable in `src/cpu/o3/O3CPU.py`[1].
The default values are set to 200, and a search through GitHub shows
that this default value seems to be always used. (At least for the
provided example configur
Hi,
As a follow-up to my previous email, I think I know what causes
the problem, but I don't know how to solve it.
The source of the problem seems to be that the value of the private
variable _compressed of RISC-V PCState objects is not set properly. In
other words, I couldn't find any place in t
Thank you Bobby for your reply.
I just found all the tags in my old repos and saved them.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 11:50 AM Bobby R. Bruce wrote:
> Abhishek,
>
> I’m not aware of any tags that were previously used to mark stable
> versions. As far as I know, gem5-19 is the first stable release.
Abhishek,
I’m not aware of any tags that were previously used to mark stable versions. As
far as I know, gem5-19 is the first stable release. If patches were made to
previous versions of the product then I suspect they were made to arbitrary
revisions, in which case I’d advise getting in contac
Could you give me more details? Where did you add the cprintf()? Which command
are you using for running gem5?
If you want to modify the gem for test purposes, I suggest inserting the
cprintf() in the tick() method because this method is always called in the
O3CPU model. I guess you might add t
Hello everyone,
Can anyone provide me with the commit number of the previous stable version
of gem5?
This stable-tags has been removed recently like 3 days before.
*Bobby and Jason*: Is there any reason for removing it?
I am asking this because there are other simulators (mostly from Prof. Onur
I’m trying to modify source code in gem5.
For testing, I add a cprintf() statement to src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh. Then
using scons, I rebuild gem5. But, any change didn’t happen.
What did I miss?
___
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.
12 matches
Mail list logo