[gem5-users] TLM Bridge Compilation Issues

2020-03-11 Thread Lin, Yen Fu
Hi All, I am on the latest commit on master (9fc9c67b4242c03f165951775be5cd0812f2a705) and trying to follow along the steps provided in util/TLM/README. However, I am seeing some compilation errors when executing this command: scons --with-cxx-config --without-python --without-tcmalloc

[gem5-users] Question about modeling 3DNoC

2020-03-11 Thread Mitra M
Hi All, can we model and simulate a 3DNoC in gem5? Thank you ___ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Re: [gem5-users] Question about modeling 3DNoC

2020-03-11 Thread Krishna, Tushar
You can see how to construct topologies here: http://www.gem5.org/documentation/general_docs/ruby/interconnection-network/ You can create a 3D NoC topology. You can use the “simple” network and use the bandwidth_factor parameter to specify different bandwidths on the 2D vs 3D links. The garnet

Re: [gem5-users] Simulation terminates successfully on one machine and runs into assertion failure on another

2020-03-11 Thread Shehab Elsayed
Hi Ciro, Thank you very much for your reply. I tried the patch in the link you sent and it seems to be working so far. Best Regards, Shehab On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 7:17 AM Ciro Santilli wrote: > Please give us stack trace (GDB it if none), full gem5 CLI, gem5 git > version, as much detail as

[gem5-users] Page Table Fault When Accessing Virtual Address

2020-03-11 Thread Muhammet Abdullah Soytürk
Hi all, I am trying to run a simulation with se.py. It works perfectly fine on my machine but when I try to run it on a workstation I am getting this error: panic: Page table fault when accessing virtual address 0x7f8ff900 I am using RISCV isa and the latest version of gem5. This is

Re: [gem5-users] Instruction size

2020-03-11 Thread niranjan soundararajan
got the size of inst from pcstate().size. Thanks On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:28 AM niranjan soundararajan < niranja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > For x86 direct branch instructions, the branchTarget() function returns a > panic. When trying to add the code to get the actual branch target (at