Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG] Gen-ARTLCreviewofdraft-ietf-opsawg-snmp-engineid-discovery-02.txt

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:56:14AM +0800, David Harrington wrote: I think the benefit to operators is greater than the risk of giving the same benefit to attackers. I am not convinced this information is sensitive. I though security considerations should spell out potential risks so that

Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG]Gen-ARTLCreviewofdraft-ietf-opsawg-snmp-engineid-discovery-02.txt

Speaking as a contributor I support option b) - (actually a+b) Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:00 AM To: David Harrington Cc: 'General Area Review Team'; [EMAIL

Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG]Gen-ARTLCreviewofdraft-ietf-opsawg-snmp-engineid-discovery-02.txt

a+b dbh -Original Message- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:00 PM To: David Harrington Cc: 'Randy Presuhn'; 'General Area Review Team'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-atm-mib-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc2763bis-00.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-10.txt

Thanks - that seems like a useful addition, and the other changes look fine to me also. Please submit, with this one extra change included. Colin On 24 Jun 2008, at 17:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Futemma-san, The proposed new version of the draft looks ok to me - it has dealt with all

Re: [Gen-art] [OPSAWG]Gen-ARTLCreviewofdraft-ietf-opsawg-snmp-engineid-discovery-02.txt

Hi - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Randy Presuhn' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'General Area Review Team' gen-art@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:59 AM Subject: Re:

[Gen-art] Assignments for 03 July 2008

Hi all, Here's the link to the assignments for the July 3rd telechat: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-080703.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 26 June 2008

Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for this week: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-080626-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc2966bis-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-enet-mib-13

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.