[Gen-art] Assignments for 28 August 2008

Hi all, Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the August 28, 2008 telechat: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-080828.html With the updated spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-review

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 21 Aug 2008

Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for this week: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-080821-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-revi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-guidelines-09

Hi, thanks for your comments! On 2008-8-12, at 15:27, ext Ben Campbell wrote: Section 3.1.1, paragraph 3: I think this paragraph may be confusing to some implementors, in that you suggest monitoring packet-loss to determine fair bandwidth competition with UDP. A few worlds elaborating on h

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tc

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-atrac-family-16.txt

Mr.Brim, Thank you for your comment and suggestion. We will update the draft reflecting your idea if we have no other comments. Best Regards, Jun > On 8/21/08 5:35 AM, actech allegedly wrote: >> Mr.Brim and Mr.Jennings, >> >> Thank you for your comments. >> I still make a friendly suggesti

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-atrac-family-16.txt

On 8/21/08 5:35 AM, actech allegedly wrote: > Mr.Brim and Mr.Jennings, > > Thank you for your comments. > >>> I still make a friendly suggestion that you document that dependency, >>> because if there is an extension to the ATRAC specification in the >>> future to support a higher bit rate, this

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-atrac-family-16.txt

Mr.Brim and Mr.Jennings, Thank you for your comments. > > I still make a friendly suggestion that you document that dependency, > > because if there is an extension to the ATRAC specification in the > > future to support a higher bit rate, this protocol might break. > > > > Scott > > If we assum

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-api-07.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dime-