[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-simple-xcap-diff-13.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements

All, I propose the following RFC Editor note... Section 1 OLD Although both static and dynamic configuration of MPLS-TP transport paths (including Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) and protection capabilities) is required by this document, it MUST be possible for

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 16 July 2009

Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for this week: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-090716-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements

Adrian - Your proposed RFC Editor notes are excellent. I consider this Gen-ART review addressed. Thanks. - Christian On Jul 16, 2009, Adrian Farrel wrote: All, I propose the following RFC Editor note... Section 1 OLD Although both static and dynamic configuration of MPLS-TP transport