[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-forces-interop-07 Reviewer: B

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review for draft-cardenas-dff-014

On May 13, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Ulrich Herberg wrote: > Ted will advise me if this can be done in an RFC editor note or a new > revision: Editor's note is fine. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07)

Yes, thanks all - I think we're nearly there… Tim On 13 May 2013, at 02:58, Liubing (Leo) wrote: > Hi, Robert > > Your careful review and comments really helped improving the document a lot. > Many thanks to you. > > All the best, > Bing > >> -Original Message- >> From: Robert Sparks

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review for draft-cardenas-dff-014

Dan, I apologize for the oversight of this issue #6. We had already agreed with Ted to make the sentence clearer by replacing it with the below text. I just forgot to actually update the draft ;-) Ted will advise me if this can be done in an RFC editor note or a new revision: from: >If no Process

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Thank you Juergen. I see that the pattern statement is therefore correct. And presumably it is a judgment call as to hw to write te new pattern to restrict the old one. Personally, I find a pattern statement that covers a whole lot of other things, but that happens when combined with the pare

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review for draft-cardenas-dff-014

Hi, As stated in the review made on a previous version of the document, from my point of view this document is ready. All my questions and concerns were answered with the exception of issue #6 mentioned below. It would be nice to have this issue answered as well, however this is a clarificatio

[Gen-art] Gen-ART (Telechat) review for draft-ietf-core-coap-16

Hi, My previous review on draft-ietf-core-coap-15 still stands. Between versions 15 and 16 of the document I cannot see any changes that address issues #2 and #3 in my initial review. In cased I missed something please let me know. It is up to the General Area Director and the rest of the IESG

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-04

Hi Yaron, Thanks for the quick review. I got the feeling that merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool got stuck anyway, because they are now in RFC Editor Queue waiting for an IANA action which may be exactly the adding the column in the registry as defined by the IANA considerations in this document. As I s

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-04

Hi Dan, Thanks for your review! We initially chose a cleaner solution which would have required draft merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool to depend on the current one. The authors of that other draft requested this change so that they can move forward to publication. I agree it's not ideal, but this ba

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Joel, this is specified in the third paragraph of section 9.4.6 of RFC 6020: 9.4.6. The pattern Statement The "pattern" statement, which is an optional substatement to the "type" statement, takes as an argument a regular expression string, as defined in [XSD-TYPES]. It is used to rest

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Forwarding to the authors and WG Regards, Benoit I am guessing that the authors intended the addition of the text emphasizing that the no-zone typedefs are derived general typedef addresses the difference in the patterns. Is there a YANG rule that says tat if typedef X is derived from typede

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Forwarding to the authors and WG Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-04 Revie