[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-06 Reviewe

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-12

Hi Christer. I've been on vacation. I think there was a miscommunication. I meant to say there's value to have explicit marking and language to describe the requirement and its priority. Otherwise, it may be confusing to have text with "shall" when the priority level is LOW. So I prefer to keep

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-12

Hi Kent, If you prefer to keep explicit marking AND language, I will respect that. It's not a major thing, so no need to spend time arguing about it :) Regards, Christer Lähettäjä: Kent Leung (kleung) [mailto:kle...@cisco.com] Lähetetty: 2. joulukuuta 2013 21:10 Vastaanottaja: Christer Holmber

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-12

Hi Christer. OK. I agree it's not a major item. I do have a preference and appreciate your feedback. Thanks. Kent From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 11:13 AM To: Kent Leung (kleung); gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-requirements...

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-13

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-13 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date:

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01

Thank You very much for the review, Scott! Regards, Christer -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] Puolesta Scott Brim Lähetetty: 1. joulukuuta 2013 17:27 Vastaanottaja: gen-art; draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn@tools.ietf.org Aihe: [Gen-art] GEN-

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14

Going back to the original Gen-ART review of the -11 version of this draft, all of the major and minor issues in that review have now been addressed. The Unicode situation is not as clean and neat as one might like, courtesy of the need to accommodate deployed implementations ("running code"), but

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve any Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve any Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve any Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-10.txt

Thank you Dan for the review and Charles for addressing the concerns. I have placed a no-obj position for this document on this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 25, 2013, at 11:39 AM, charles newyork wrote: > That's great, I will keep it as in the current 11 version then. Again thank > you s

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-forces-ceha-08.txt

Thank you Francis for your careful review (as always) and Evangelos for taking the comments into account in the new draft. I have placed a no-obj position for this document in this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 19, 2013, at 1:57 AM, Haleplidis Evangelos wrote: > Greetings Francis, > > Th

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipfix-mediation-protocol-07

Thanks for the review, Meral, and for taking the issues into account, Benoit. I have placed a no-obj recommendation for this document in this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 26, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Hi Meral, > > Thanks for your feedback. > See > http://tools.ietf.or

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis-01.txt

Thank you Brian - another review that spotted important issues. Thanks all for taking care of this. I have placed a no-obj recommendation for the document in this week's telechat. Jari On Nov 13, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Thanks Acee. I will update the review when this com

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-02

Thank you for your review, Joel! Jari On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments al

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-08

Thanks for your review, Peter! Btw, I am trying to understand what happened when this document went to PS from INF. Last calls were definitely on INF. Jari On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:23 PM, Peter Yee wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please se

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-leiba-smime-type-registry-02

Thanks for your review, Ben! Jari On Nov 25, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > >> Hi, Ben, and thanks for the review. >> >>> -- It might be helpful to include the URL of the parent registry. I assume >>> it's intended to be http://ww

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-13

Thank you Christer for your review, and for Kent for addressing the comments. I have placed a no-obj recommendation for this draft. Jari On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-05

Thanks for your review, Alexey! I have placed a no-obj recommendation for this draft on this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:46 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >