Re: [Gen-art] gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-clksrc-09

2014-02-05 Thread Aidan Williams
Hi Jari,Yes, we are happy to make changes to address these comments.- aidanSent from my HTC- Reply message -From: "Jari Arkko" To: "Scott Brim" Cc: "gen-art" , "draft-ietf-avtcore-clksrc all" Subject: [Gen-art] gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-clksrc-09Date: Wed, Feb 5, 2014 7:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-crocker-id-adoption-05

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you for the review. I have also reviewed the document myself and found an excellent, thank you for writing it! I have balloted Yes for this document. Jari On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-requirements

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you for the review & edits! Jari On Feb 5, 2014, at 4:25 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these c

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-09

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks, all. Jari On Jan 31, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Paul E. Jones wrote: > Thanks. I made the correction in my local copy. > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Elwyn Davies" > To: "General Area Review Team" > Cc: draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts@tools.ietf.org > Sent: 1/31/2014 1:

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-10.txt

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your (old) review of this document. Given the significant textual changes, I also re-read the document now. Looked OK to me… and at least some of the editorial comments have been taken into account. jari On Jun 27, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-AR

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-clksrc-09

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Authors: I agree with Scott's recommendation. Are you willing to consider the change? (But I have balloted no-obj.) Jari On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Scott Brim wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-stox-presence-07

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Joel Jari On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. > Yours, > Joel > > On 1/30/14, 8:46 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: >> Joel Halpern2013-12-11 draft-ietf-stox-presence-07* > __

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-04

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Joel! On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. > Yours, > Joel > > On 1/31/14, 11:34 AM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: >> Joel Halpern draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-04* > _

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-stox-core-09

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Dan! Jari On Feb 5, 2014, at 4:39 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these commen

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-14

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you for your review, Christer! Jari On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:23 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direct

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Joel: Many thanks again for your review and re-review, and to the authors for the revisions. I have balloted no-obj. By the way, as an example of the usefulness of the Gen-ART system, take this week. I'm writing this onboard a day-long flight that I use to set my IESG positions. On the remainde

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-p2psip-drr-10.txt (resent)

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you Francis for the review and Ning for the update. I have balloted no-obj. Jari On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:57 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi, > > this was a gen-art review. So, I am cc:ing gen-art@ietf.org > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > On 26/11/2013 9:54 AM, Zongning wrote: >> Hi, Fran

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-11

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you for your review and re-review, Dan! And thank you authors for the revisions! I have balloted no-obj. jari On Feb 5, 2014, at 4:52 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-protocol-25

2014-02-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you very much Martin for your review, and Richard for the quick responses and your interest in correcting issues. I expect a new version of the draft is needed for the string issue. Jari On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:57 PM, Y. Richard Yang wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Wendy gave a good summary on

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-protocol-25

2014-02-05 Thread Martin Thomson
On 5 February 2014 05:01, Elwyn Davies wrote: > This is not really anything to do with me but I would point out that the > Information Centric Networking folks would probably disagree with the > view on "new data" that Martin expresses below - ICN would prefer that > if the data is the same then i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-protocol-25

2014-02-05 Thread Elwyn Davies
This is not really anything to do with me but I would point out that the Information Centric Networking folks would probably disagree with the view on "new data" that Martin expresses below - ICN would prefer that if the data is the same then it has a single way of naming it and any copy is as good

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review ofdraft-ietf-avtext-rtp-duplication-04.txt

2014-02-05 Thread Ali C. Begen (abegen)
Hi Suresh, The text in section 7 says why this method is good for managed networks and is not for unmanaged networks. In managed environments, you have a pretty good idea of what is happening. By design, there should not be any congestion problems in such networks anyway (for the managed traffi

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-11

2014-02-05 Thread Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-11 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 2/5/2014 IETF LC End Date: 2013/09/30 IESG Telechat date:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-stox-core-09

2014-02-05 Thread Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-stox-core Reviewer:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-requirements

2014-02-05 Thread Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-req