[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eman-framework-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05

Hi Roni, Thanks for taking the time. Minor issues: 1. In section 3.2 (a):  I noticed that the policy to update the registry according   to section 5 is standard action so it should be the same here since this is an update to the registry. Hmmm, but I don't think so. Section 5 (and the

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05

Hi Adrian, I do not have a strong position on this topic ( I can agree that deprecating a code point is a rare case) , I was wondering why the difference and I can agree with any direction that you will choose about the maturity level needed Roni -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

Hello Elwyn, Thank you for your review. See my response in-line [Huub] I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call

[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-vanelburg-dispatch-private-network-ind-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-vanelburg-dispatch-private-network-ind-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-14

Thanks. Regarding the first comment, the abstract can be elaborated a little more as follows: This document defines the requirements for Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) at the network layer. The hierarchical structure in traditional wireless networks has led primarily to