Thank you Robert for your review. Per my review of the -12, it looks like the
issues that you raised have been addressed. Do you agree?
Jari
On 10 Apr 2014, at 19:25, Fedyk, Don don.fe...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Robert
Thanks for your comments.
Inline [Don]
I've incorporated your feedback
Peter, Keyur,
First: thank you Peter for your review.
I am looking at the changes from the reviewed draft to the most recent one:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-06.txturl2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-09.txt
and I think they cover
Thanks for your review, Meral!
Jari
On 10 Jun 2014, at 02:55, Meral Shirazipour meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com
wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please
Thank you both of you.
I have also reviewed the document, and I think it is ready to move forward.
Jari
On 03 Jun 2014, at 16:11, Christer Holmberg christer.holmb...@ericsson.com
wrote:
Thanks, Scott! :)
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art
Thank You, Jari! :)
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: Jari Arkko
Sent: 10. kesäkuuta 2014 10:27
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc: Scott Brim; gen-art; draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls-07
Thank you
Thanks for your review. I have also reviewed the document.
Jari
On 02 Jun 2014, at 15:46, Francis Dupont francis.dup...@fdupont.fr wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
Roni, many thanks for your review. And Marc for the responses (which were
sufficient for me).
I have also read this document. I have no concerns either; thanks for a
well-written document.
Jari
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Thanks for the review, Brian, and thank you Warren and Olafur for answers. I do
agree with the remaining issues as listed by Brian below; can I expect a new
draft revision to address these?
Jari
On 06 Jun 2014, at 05:12, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am the assigned
Francis, Jari - thanks for your reviews. I will address those editorial issues
in the next revision of the draft.
- Ralph
On Jun 10, 2014, at 3:37 AM 6/10/14, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@ericsson.com wrote:
Thanks for your review. I have also reviewed the document.
Jari
On 02 Jun 2014, at
On 6/10/14, 1:56 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Thank you Robert for your review. Per my review of the -12, it looks like the
issues that you raised have been addressed. Do you agree?
Except possibly for one, which I'm leaving to the ADs.
I see you weren't copied on one of the threads - I've forwarded
Thanks!
On 10 Jun 2014, at 17:57, Olafur Gudmundsson o...@ogud.com wrote:
Jari,
we will push one out today
Olafur
On Jun 10, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@ericsson.com wrote:
Thanks for the review, Brian, and thank you Warren and Olafur for answers. I
do
Posted
you welcome
Olafur
On Jun 10, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@ericsson.com wrote:
Thanks!
On 10 Jun 2014, at 17:57, Olafur Gudmundsson o...@ogud.com wrote:
Jari,
we will push one out today
Olafur
On Jun 10, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Jari Arkko
OK, the -14 version is fine IMHO. (Jari, a few of my points were explained
by email so did not result in text changes.)
Just one thing - you don't need to acknowledge my review, but if
you do, please s/Carpender/Carpenter/.
Regards
Brian
On 11/06/2014 05:14, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
Posted
On Jun 10, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, the -14 version is fine IMHO. (Jari, a few of my points were explained
by email so did not result in text changes.)
Just one thing - you don't need to acknowledge my review, but if
you do, please
14 matches
Mail list logo
