Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-03.txt

Hi Francis, Thanks for your comments. I shall fix all below issues in next version of the draft. Although I have comments for couple of issues below. Please check inline. Thanks, Dushyant. On 06/07/15 19:16, "Francis Dupont" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For backg

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-10

I think those cases should be fine, per your explanation. Btw I often try to use a different style in the abstract, one that is self-contained and relies little on acronyms. I know it isn’t always possible. Jari On 09 Jul 2015, at 06:04, Yoav Nir wrote: > Hi > > Sorry about that. I have look

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-10

Hi Sorry about that. I have looked over the draft looking for acronyms that were not spelled out before use, and I could find only three: AEAD, which is used unexpanded in the Abstract, but expanded before the next use in the Introduction. I thought it was acceptable to avoid expansions in the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-10

Meral, Thanks for the careful review. All comments accepted. I will spin a new version before the draft goes to IESG Review. Ron From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:02 PM To: draft-iet

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-06

Thank you, both of you. Jari On 06 Jul 2015, at 21:22, Uma Chunduri wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thank you. > > As agreed earlier I shall address your last comment (Nit: below) in the next > revision (by taking care couple of other comments from Security and OPSEC > area). > Yes, shall make sure

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases-02

Thanks for the review and for spotting these, Tom. I agree… Authors? Jari On 04 Jul 2015, at 20:58, Tom Taylor wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Ple

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08.txt

Thanks for the review. Authors? I agree with the points Suresh makes, btw. Jari On 08 Jul 2015, at 13:30, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08.txt

Thanks for the review. Authors? I agree with the points Suresh makes, btw. Jari On 08 Jul 2015, at 13:30, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10

Thanks, all. I’m very happy to have received so many good reviews for this telechat cycle (including this one). Happy that the issues were resolved, of course, as well. Jari On 22 Jun 2015, at 09:54, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi Warren, > > Q1_2: > > It is really difficult to understa

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08

Thanks for your review! On 19 Jun 2015, at 18:18, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-11.txt

Paul: Thanks for this excellent and detailed review (and one that was truly from a generalist point of view). And Tiru, thank you for taking the comments into account. Paul, what is your opinion, has the newest draft sufficiently addressed your original comments? Jari signature.asc Descript

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-10

Thanks for the review, Meral! (Authors, I assume you have seen the editorial comment below on acronyms; I don’t see any e-mail related to it.) Jari On 30 Jun 2015, at 07:10, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see

Re: [Gen-art] [Roll] Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-04

Yusuke, Peter, thanks for detailed review and changes. Jari On 02 Jul 2015, at 11:26, Yusuke DOI wrote: > Dear Peter, > > Thank you for review. I submitted -06 (-05 contains some nits) as a revised > version. > > On 2015-06-26 08:15, Peter Yee wrote: >> Some of the parameters are described w

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-07

Meral: Thanks for your review! (This time speaking as an author. If this review had listed comments or issues, I would have sent it to the other ADs for thinking if they want to raise a DISCUSS or COMMENT.) Jari On 07 Jul 2015, at 22:09, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

Joel - thank you very much for the review. And thanks for Addressing the issues, Mike. Jari On 07 Jul 2015, at 00:31, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > That would work for me. It gets in the point that the comparing entity, as > well as the generating entity, needs to plan for this. > > Thank you, >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-btle-14

Elwyn: Many thanks for your detailed review. And thanks all for the changes for the previous version of the review. Jari On 07 Jul 2015, at 11:22, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.i

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-03.txt

Thanks for the review. Authors, shepherd/AD, do you have any comments on Francis’ TLS issue below? Jari On 06 Jul 2015, at 15:46, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression

Thank you all for the reviews & corrections. Jari On 06 Jul 2015, at 15:27, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for di

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05 Rev

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-precis-nickname-18

Hi Paul, thanks for the review! Peter P.S. This will finally free up draft-ietf-simple-chat too... On 7/8/15 1:33 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <​ http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtf

Re: [Gen-art] [homenet] Objection to late change in draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment

That seems OK to me. There are some aspects that we need to discuss over in Anima in due course. Brian On 09/07/2015 01:53, Pierre Pfister wrote: > Thank you for this proposal. > > In the same spirit (but reducing the amount of changes), what about > « and can therefore be used in fully auton

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-precis-nickname-18

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <​ http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC Very clean document. I looked hard for something to criticize,

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-precis-nickname-18

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <​ http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC Very clean document. I looked hard for something to criticize,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-10

Hi Dan, thanks for reviewing the document! Peter On 7/6/15 7:16 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq Please resolve these comments along with

Re: [Gen-art] [homenet] Objection to late change in draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment

Thank you for this proposal. In the same spirit (but reducing the amount of changes), what about « and can therefore be used in fully autonomic as well as configured networks » ? I think « configured » has a smaller scope than « professionally managed network ». - Pierre > Le 7 juil. 2015

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-appsawg-text-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

I agree with the discussion and propose the following text to address the comments. NEW: If a PCP server resets or loses the PCP SA due to reboot, power failure, or any reason then it sends unsolicited ANNOUNCE response as explained in section 14.1.3 of [RFC6887] to the PCP client. Upon