Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03.txt

Hi Robert, Thanks for your quick response. Your explanations sound good. On 09/02/2015 10:52 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: >> * Section 2 >> >> Not sure what the "draft's primary email alias" refers to. Is this the >> draft-...@ietf.org or draft-foo@ietf.org? In either case it may make >> sense

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11 Reviewer:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-07.txt

Russ and Suresh have a discussion going on, that I think is almost resolved. In any case I'll make sure that stuff is handled before we send to RFC editor. (There are a couple of other threads that'll result in minor changes too.) Cheers, S. On 02/09/15 20:04, Jari Arkko wrote: > Suresh, thanks

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00

Thanks for your review, Joel. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-josefsson-scrypt-kdf-03

I have had no replies on this, and just want to double check that it has been received. Thanks, Paul On 8/25/15 2:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <​ http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/ge

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-15

Thanks for the review, David, and the updates, Warren. I have balloted no-objection for this draft on tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-07.txt

Suresh, thanks for the review again! Russ, Suresh had some further questions. I’d like to deal with them before the draft gets finally approved, which might happen tomorrow. Jari On 02 Sep 2015, at 06:40, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Russ, > Thanks for addressing the comments. Your suggested

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art telechat review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256-04 (was Re: Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256)

thanks for your review again, Robert! Jari On 01 Sep 2015, at 21:54, Robert Sparks wrote: > For completeness in the gen-art archives and so that Jari doesn't have to go > looking: > > (boilerplate elided) > > Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard > > On 8/4/15 1:43 PM, Rober

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-tls-padding-02

Thanks for your review, Meral! Appreciated. Jari On 01 Sep 2015, at 02:15, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direc

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cice-01

Thanks for your review again, Tom! I’ve raised the header question. Jari On 03 Aug 2015, at 17:06, Tom Taylor wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Plea

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-08

Peter, thank you again for the review, and this one is indeed a detailed one! Based on -09 I think the authors have seen the review and have or are checking the draft to make changes if needed. One remaining issue is that I think when you said "octet size 0” in the draft your probably meant “octet

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03.txt

Thanks Suresh! On 9/1/15 10:17 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a ne

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-34.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-precis-nickname-18

+1 On 01 Sep 2015, at 23:01, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: > Hi Paul, thanks for the review! > > Peter > > On 8/28/15 9:00 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechatl review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-h265-14

Thanks for the review and re-review, Brian. Much appreciated. Jari On 28 Aug 2015, at 06:55, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-04

Thanks again for your review. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-bradner-iaoc-terms-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please s