Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02

2016-02-29 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
Ben Campbell wrote: We did not mean to imply that ART was limited to human communication. That was intended to describe a subset of ART (the historically RAI work; primarily the clusters of SIP, SDP,and RTP related groups plus a few higher-in-the-stack groups such as RTCWEB). Ben, thanks

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02

2016-02-29 Thread Ben Campbell
On 29 Feb 2016, at 8:45, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: Ben Campbell wrote: (+ART ADs) On 26 Feb 2016, at 14:43, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: Minor: - S1, "Other RAI working groups develop extensions to SIP that do not change the core protocol, new applications of SIP, and other technologies for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02

2016-02-29 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
Ben Campbell wrote: (+ART ADs) On 26 Feb 2016, at 14:43, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: Minor: - S1, "Other RAI working groups develop extensions to SIP that do not change the core protocol, new applications of SIP, and other technologies for interactive communication among humans." Are we

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt

2016-02-29 Thread Francis Dupont
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at