Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08

From: Ralph Droms [mailto:rdroms.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 6:34 AM To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) Cc: Review Area gen-art@ietf.org Team ; draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery@ietf.org; IETF discussion list

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC2/Telechat review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24

> On Aug 17, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Paul Giralt (pgiralt) wrote: > > >> On Aug 17, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: >> >>> Back to the current document: I have reread s3 of RFC 7206 and there are >>> some points that need to be sorted out: >>> >>> -

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08

Tiru - thanks for advising me of your responses to the points in my review. Do you and the other authors have any thoughts about my recommendations for section 5? - Ralph > On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:24 AM 8/17/16, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) > wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC2/Telechat review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24

> On Aug 17, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > >> Back to the current document: I have reread s3 of RFC 7206 and there are >> some points that need to be sorted out: >> >> - The term 'end-to-end' is given a slightly specialized meaning in RFC 7206. >> This is

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC2/Telechat review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24

Whether the session ID draft needs reworking or holding depends on whether the IESG (and the rest of the community) wants to prejudge the meaning/wordng of Barry's draft before it becomes an RFC.  As you say, the other case in point is somewhat different.  I'll repeat that given the  existence

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC2/Telechat review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24

On 17 Aug 2016, at 12:04, Elwyn Davies wrote: Hi, Ben. Having read Barry's proposed update for RFC 3967, I would be happy for that to become the status quo. However, I would distinguish between truly foundational documents that are produced in tandem with the protocol standards or

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack

Ron, Dale — thanks for the review & edit. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04

Folks, I don’t know what to do with this draft. I’ve read the draft, prompted by Paul’s review. While I can understand most of what it says, I have to say it is a very difficult read. Probably due to the large complex system that it is a part of. But, I’ve been thoroughly unable to convince

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-02

Thanks, all. Jari On 08 Aug 2016, at 19:40, Christer Holmberg wrote: > That should work :) > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > Christer > > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] > Sent: 08 August 2016 20:39 > To: Christer Holmberg

Re: [Gen-art] [Isis-wg] IETF Last Call Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis-01

Dale, Les, thanks for the reviews and fixes. Much appreciated. I have balloted no-obj for this doc for tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC2/Telechat review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24

Hi, Ben. Having read Barry's proposed update for RFC 3967, I would be happy for that to become the status quo. However, I would distinguish between truly foundational documents that are produced in tandem with the protocol standards or subsequently (as mentioned in Barry's draft) and what

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03

appolgies for setting this aside for a month. IETF intervened, I don't plan to advance this until the question is addressed in any event. On 7/8/16 1:32 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the review. Please see inline. > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Droms [mailto:rdroms.i...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:58 AM > To: Review Area gen-art@ietf.org Team > Cc: draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery@ietf.org; IETF