[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-03

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20

Hi, Thanks for the quick answer and for addressing my comments. On respect to: > There is no conflict, as the eCall document applies to regions that adhere to the E.U. eCall system, and this document applies to other regions. I added the following sentence to the paragraphs in the Abstract and

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20

Hi Dan, Thanks for your review. Please see in-line. At 3:13 AM -0800 1/5/17, Dan Romascanu wrote: Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by

Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

Brian E Carpenter writes: > Hi Thomas, > > The responses to my comments almost all look fine to me. Just one point, > on MINOR COMMENT 4 (slide 8): > > "Shouldn't this also say that this value MUST NOT be used in > operational networks?" > > We've seen many cases over the years of informal

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05

Hi Orit, Thanks much for your time for reviewing the document. We will fix the nits. Best Regards, Huaimo -Original Message- From: Orit Levin [mailto:or...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 7:12 PM To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org;

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-adid-urn-02

Thanks! On 17 Dec 2016, at 05:36, Brian Carpenter wrote: > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready > > Gen-ART telechat review of draft-adid-urn-02 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

Many thanks Elwyn for your detailed review. I also found the discussion afterwards enlightening. I’m expecting the authors to draw some conclusions re: possible modifications based on the questions and answers. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12

> I think the document need an editorial review, a lot of text in > passive language, for example third paragraph in section 1 > "BGPsec needs to be spoken only by an AS's eBGP speaking, AKA border, > routers, and is designed so that it can be used to protect > announcements which are originated

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05

Orit: thanks for your review. FWIW, I agree with your comments. Authors? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [i2rs] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-09

Hello Jari, No, I did not see Stewart's comments and checking my email, I don't think I received them. (I saw other comments, e.g. Kathleen's and Benoit's.) Stewart, could you please resend? Thank you! --- Alex -Original Message- From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

Thanks! On 05 Jan 2017, at 07:53, Wassim Haddad wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02

Thanks! On 04 Jan 2017, at 03:53, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12

thanks roni. i wonder how i missed your message. my bad. >> I think the document need an editorial review, a lot of text in >> passive language, for example i confess it is my normal mode, despite being a strunk and white fan. sometimes rfced agrees, sometimes not and fixes. unless it is a

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21

Russ et al: Thank you for the review, changes, and re-review! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-19

Dale, all, Thanks for the review, re-review, and changes. I’m posting a No Objection position for this draft in today’s IESG telechat. But: > 3.1.1. Subject > > However, each > certificate issued by an individual CA MUST contain a Subject name > that is unique to that CA context. > >