Hi Stewart,
Thanks for the review. I've updated the abstract, removed the vestigial
reference, added a reference for EDNS0 and clarified how it is used in the
design I describe.
Thanks again for your attention to it,
Ted
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Stewart Bryant
wrote:
> Reviewer: Stew
At 10:42 AM -0500 2/22/17, Dale R. Worley wrote:
Gunnar Hellström writes:
A. Call failure
If a call fails due to no available language match, in what way(s)
does it fail? Section 5.3 says
If such an offer is received, the receiver MAY
reject the media, ignore the language s
At 11:57 AM +0100 2/22/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote:
A few comments inline,
Den 2017-02-22 kl. 02:44, skrev Randall Gellens:
Hi Dale,
Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline.
At 6:32 PM -0800 2/17/17, Dale Worley wrote:
Reviewer: Dale Worley
Review result: Re
Thanks!
There is one before this for the other major question.
Also, I am working on the minor changes & "wordiness" of the document. Spencer
had a great idea to move some more things into an Appendix. So, have done that.
Should have that cleaned up in a day or two.
Nalini Elkins
Inside Prod
Hi,
I’ll have a review of the changes shortly. Just wanted to acknowledge I’ve seen
this mail ;)
Thanks,
Jouni
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 10:12 AM, nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com wrote:
>
> I don't know why this email keeps getting cut off!
>
> I am attaching my response in a text file
My thanks as well - to Robert for a most careful review and to Greg for
handling the draft for all these years.
Regards,
Sasha
On Feb 22, 2017 16:22, "Greg Mirsky" wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> agreed. Thank you for your thorough review and the most helpful comments.
> I'll upload the update shortly.
>
Hi Robert,
agreed. Thank you for your thorough review and the most helpful comments.
I'll upload the update shortly.
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> I would simply delete "To ensure precise accuracy in time determination"
> and start the sentence at "These
Francis Dupont writes:
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - ToC page 1 and 3 page 3 (title): Benefitting -> Benefiting
>
> - 3 page 3 (suggest): CoRE etc, -> CoRE, etc,
Fixed.
> - 4 page 3: reading the document I had a question about the "no need
> ... to specify the internal structure" but th
A few comments inline,
Den 2017-02-22 kl. 02:44, skrev Randall Gellens:
Hi Dale,
Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline.
At 6:32 PM -0800 2/17/17, Dale Worley wrote:
Reviewer: Dale Worley
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this
I would simply delete "To ensure precise accuracy in time determination"
and start the sentence at "These actions"
RjS
On 2/15/17 9:40 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Hi Robert,
safe travel and here's another version for your consideration. The
point I'm trying to convey is that the jitter is real bu
10 matches
Mail list logo
