On 24 Sep 2018, at 15:26, Lou Berger wrote:
Hi Pete,
It's a reasonable question. I think the document serves a
number of purposes:
- It has been the document that has been guiding the scope of the
solutions being worked in the WG this is the one that I think you are
keying off of.
-
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, pleas
Hi Pete,
It's a reasonable question. I think the document serves a number
of purposes:
- It has been the document that has been guiding the scope of the
solutions being worked in the WG this is the one that I think you are
keying off of.
- It also serves a long lived purpose to help t
please ignore this message
Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
From:Hesham ElBakoury
To:eag...@dolby.com,resn...@episteme.net,draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.sheph...@ietf.org
Cc:gen-art@ietf.org,det...@ietf.org,db3...@att.com
Date:2018-09-24 20:32:06
Subject:Re: [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of
d
where else it can be standardized besides IETF ?
Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
From:Grossman, Ethan A.
To:Pete Resnick,draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases.sheph...@ietf.org
Cc:gen-art@ietf.org,det...@ietf.org,Deborah Brungard
Date:2018-09-24 19:31:40
Subject:Re: [Detnet] Preliminary Qs for Genart review of
As a WG participant, I would like to add that the use cases are the major
input that the WG used to produce the Architecture and other documents, so
if people read them and don't find the text there sufficient to determine
"why" a particular decision was made, then reading the use cases would be
va
Hi Pete,
My observation is that the DetNet WG made a decision to not have a
"Requirements" draft, instead casting the Use Cases draft in that role, but in
a more flexible way, i.e. the design is intended to achieve as much as can be
achieved toward the "requirements" (the "least common denomina
Hi Lou,
I've got a preliminary question about draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases that
isn't answered in the intro to the document or in your shepherd writeup.
I've Cced the WG just to make sure they're in the loop, and I've Cced
the gen-art list and the responsible AD just in case Deborah or any of
Hi. Thanks for the detailed comments.
Some responses...
On 9/24/2018 3:00 AM, Francesca Palombini wrote:
The use of underscored node names is specific to each RRTYPE that is
being scoped.
As an non-expert in the area, I would have appreciate a ref to a document
introducing RRTYPE.
T
Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
Fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
