Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-03

I understand that the issuer has no choice. What I can't see is how any validator will accept the new certificate. The new cert will fail the validation check required by the field in the existing certificate. So it seems that the only remedy is to wait until the exist certificate expires, so th

Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-03

Joel: If access to the key is lost, the commitment is broken, so the Root CA must make a fresh start using a completely unrelated key. Maybe the word "remedy" is creating the wrong impression for you. Russ > On Jan 4, 2019, at 6:42 PM, jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com wrote: > > If the new self-s

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-03

If the new self-signed cert uses a new key, wouldn't that be rejected as violating the promise in the current cert?  I am missing something. Thanks,Joel Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Russ Housley Date: 1/4/19 17:57 (GMT-05:0

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-03

Joel: Thanks for the review. > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-03 > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2019-01-04 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-01-10 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as an Informational

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-03

Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more inf

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-xmpp-grid-09

Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Fo

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-push-21

Hi, … >> Example: pn-prid = 00fc13adff78512 >> >> For more information about the APNs Topic and device token: >> >> SB> Is the following part of the example? If so it could usefully be >> delimited >> SB> as such, otherwise, I don't understand why it is not a normal document >> SB> reference