Hi Vijay,
Many thanks for your review.
I will fix your nits in the next version. (See inline)
Thanks
Bala'zs
-Original Message-
From: detnet On Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani via
Datatracker
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 3:58 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; det...@ietf.org;
dr
Hi Paul,
Many thanks for your review. I will update the next version with the nits.
Thanks
Bala'zs
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kyzivat
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 6:20 PM
To: draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn@ietf.org
Cc: General Area Review Team
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call revie
Hi Ines,
Many thanks for your review.
See my reactions and proposed updates below.
Thanks
Bala'zs
-Original Message-
From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2021 12:57 AM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: det...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn@ietf.org;
last-
Hello Erik,
Revision -23 (soon to be published) should incorporate the remaining issues
(most of the previous ones were fixed in the just released -22). See EV23>
Thank you again for your valuable review
-éric
-Original Message-
From: Eric Vyncke
Date: Saturday, 14 December 2019 at 2
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more informatio
Dave Crocker writes:
> I suppose a clarification could be added along the lines of:
>
> OLD:
> The emoji(s) express a recipient's summary reaction to the specific
> message referenced by the accompanying In-Reply-To header field.
> [Mail-Fmt].
>
> NEW:
> The emoji(s) express a reci
