Re: [Gen-art] Genart early review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-08

Hi Stewart, Thanks for your review and your comments. I have incorporated them in the next revision of this draft (rev09). Please refer to my comments marked with “Ali>” below for more details: From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker Date: Monday, April 29, 2024 at 8:49 AM To: gen-art@ietf.org C

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05

Peter, Thanks for your review and your comments. Please refer to my replies below marked with "AS>". On 12/19/18, 8:15 AM, "Pete Resnick" wrote: Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Rev

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10

As requested, added a note in the IANA section. Cheers, Ali From: Alvaro Retana Date: Friday, December 22, 2017 at 5:34 AM To: Vijay Gurbani , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay@ietf.org" Cc: "b...@ietf.org" , "i...@ietf.org" , "gen-art@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-13

Hi Dale, Please refer to my replies inline marked with ³Ali>². On 9/11/17, 4:51 AM, "Dale Worley" wrote: >Reviewer: Dale Worley >Review result: Ready with Nits > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being process

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-10

We¹ll do. Thanks, Ali On 10/17/14, 1:23 PM, "Adrian Farrel" wrote: > >> BTW, since these are just editorial changes, I will just give them to >>the >> RFC editor, unless you want me to check the new rev in. > >Give them the edits and ask whether they'd like a new rev. > >Thanks, >Adrian > __

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-10

Martin, thanks for your comments and Adrian, thanks for your input & suggestions. Adrian, I will go ahead and add the paragraph that you suggested to the beginning of section 5. Also, several comments revolve around the motivation of this draft and what it tries to solve, etc. Although this is

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-06

Vijay, Jari: Thanks for your comments. (R13) and (R14) are security related requirements and to clarify this point, I have expanded on these requirements: (R13) A solution MUST be capable of detecting and properly handling a situation where the same MAC address appears behind two different Ether

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05

Ben, Thanks for your comments. I have incorporated all your comments in rev06 of this draft. On 9/23/13 1:29 PM, "Ben Campbell" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >