Hi Brian,
The following appear to me to be used normatively; the absence of an
upper case keyword doesn't prove the absence of a normative reference:
[RFC2784] Farinacci, D., Li, T., Hanks, S., Meyer, D., and P.
Traina, Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), RFC 2784,
Hi Brian,
Hi Hesham, why are we both working at the weekend?
= Good question :) At least we seem to be in the same time zone!
The following appear to me to be used normatively; the absence of an
upper case keyword doesn't prove the absence of a normative reference:
[RFC2784]
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the review and apologies for the late response. I'll only respond
to comments that need further discussions or include your questions. I won't
include comments that I'll address as you requested.
3.3.2. Foreign Network Supports IPv4 Only
If the mobile node is in a
I'm puzzled by the choice of acronym. GRE refers to RFC2784 which has its
own encapsulation header format.
= I know, it's the same GRE. People wanted to put GRE encapsulation in this
specification.
Well in that case there needs to be a reference to RFC2784 and perhaps
RFC2890. I'm
Thank you for your comments.
Summary: Almost ready for publication as a proposed standard.
Comments:
Significant:
As I read this protocol, if a Home Agent is beign used, then
packets arriving at the MAP from the Home Agent will be tunneled,
with the original packet inside a
-Original Message-
From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/22/2006 4:51 AM
To: Scott W Brim; General Area Review Team; Jari Arkko; Mark Townsley
(townsley); Bob Hinden; Brian Haberman; Thomas Narten; Erik Nordmark;
William Allen Simpson; ipv6@ietf.org;
