Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-09

Thanks for your (re-)reviews, Christer! Jari > On 11 Jan 2021, at 10.51, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Christer Holmberg > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-08

Christer, Many thanks for your review! Inline: > Section 6.1. says: > > "The URNs generated according to the rules defined in this document > result in long-term stable unique identifiers for the devices." > > - What are those rules? > > In Section 3.3 I do see the following statement: > > "

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06

Thanks for your review, Dan. Some responses below. We are also about to publish a new document version. > This is a very detailed and well-written document that describes a new > specification of the specification of EAP-AKA' to support 5G deployments. This > specification is ready, but I have a

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-12

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: On the Right Track I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-01

Thank you, Robert. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-wilde-sunset-header-07

Sounds good. Thanks. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-wilde-sunset-header-07

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale

Thanks for your review, Meral! Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Not Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00

Thanks for your review, Robert! Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-15

Thanks for the responses, Geoff. One minor follow-up: > The final point I am not so convinced about. The reason is scope of the > document. This document is an instruction to folk who write DNS recursive > resolvers. It is not an instruction to folk who want to set up zones that > could be us

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-15

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-14

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07

Thanks for your response, Qin. Some further comments: > [Qin]: Yes, there are implementations, something broken in RFC8049 needs to > get right. Cool.. > I'm not sure I fully understand the need for "SP MUST honour " > language in the document. Are there parts of the described model that they

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-04

Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11

Thanks for your review, Vijay! On 16 Mar 2017, at 22:27, Vijay Gurbani wrote: > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Ch

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-13

Thanks for your substantial comments, Stewart. Are there any comments from the authors or the WG otherwise? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailm

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-06

Thanks for the review, Stewart! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [dane] Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15

Oh and the nits do need to be looked at. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [dane] Review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-15

Thanks for the in-depth and substantial review, Dale! While I agree with Dale’s points, I recognise that some topics may have been discussed and chosen to be solved in a particular fashion by the WG. As a result, I plan to post a no-objection position for this document in today’s IESG telechat.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-04

Thanks for your review, Joel! I plan to post a no-objection position for tonight’s IESG telechat on this document. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.or

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10

Brian - Mark: thanks. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-04

Thanks for the view, Paul. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05

Meral, Daniel — thanks. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-grow-mrt-add-paths-03

Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17

Thanks for your review, Russ. For what it is worth, I agree with your comment/question about the credentials. It is fine to have different arrangements for different situations, but Russ’s question was really not about that but whether the CA information mentioned earlier is a part of a specific

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12

Roni: thanks for the review. Authors: did you note the typo? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09

Thanks for the review, Christer! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dime-load-08

Thanks! On 12 Mar 2017, at 16:47, Roni Even wrote: > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction

Re: [Gen-art] [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18

Joel, Robert, Dhruv, Thanks for the review and discussion. Does some of this cause some clarifications to be made to the document? Haven’t seen a new version… just asking so that we’re not missing anything. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17

Thanks for your review, Pete. I have posted a no-objection position for today’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/g

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03

Thanks! On 04 Mar 2017, at 02:06, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-02

Thanks you! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-05

On 16 Feb 2017, at 20:12, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Russ, > > This isn’t normal practice, but based on your comment, the IPR declaration > has been reissued explicitly for the WG draft. Thanks. This isn’t required, but it is helpful. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with Open

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection-05

Thanks for your review, Russ. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-sgtatham-secsh-iutf8-05

Thanks for the review, Roni! Jari On 09 Feb 2017, at 08:40, Roni Even wrote: > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair.

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04.txt

Thanks for you review, Francis, and thanks for the updates, Tero! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04

Thanks for your review, Stewart :-) signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-10

Thanks for your review, Ralph! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-bidirection-07

Thanks. On 25 Feb 2017, at 02:33, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD >

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-14

Robert: Thanks for the reviews and re-reviews. I have balloted no-objection for this document on tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06

Thanks for the review, Meral! Jari On 25 Feb 2017, at 02:37, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination-05

Jouni, Weiqiang, Thanks for the review and for considering the comments. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-06

Thanks! On 16 Feb 2017, at 17:29, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: > Hi Jari, all, > > Comment noted and should make it to an update when we process the other > comments received! > > Tim > > >> On 16 Feb 2017, at 12:58, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> Thanks f

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04.txt

Thanks for the detailed review, Francis! Authors — did you make a note of the comments? Did not see a response… Jari On 24 Jan 2017, at 18:33, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being pr

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23

Brian, Christer: thanks. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib-11

All: thanks for the review and discussion. I plan to vote “no-objection” for this document in tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.iet

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04

Thanks! On 01 Feb 2017, at 23:18, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-08

Thanks for your (re)-review Pete Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Dale: Many thanks for this review, which indeed was exceptionally useful. (“Super” as Charlie put it.) I have placed a no-objection position for this document for tonight’s IESG telechat. But I think your discussion on the details of changes inspired by Dale’s review probably needs to continue

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-05

Roni: thanks for your detailed review. I also appreciate the responses and changes by you Tianxiang. I have balloted no-objection for this document for today’s IESG telechat, and expect that the discussed changes will find themselves into a new document version at some point. Jari signature.asc

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-06

Thanks for your review, Orit! (Authors, did you note the comment?) Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-11

Many thanks for your review, Joel. I have balloted no-objection for this document on today’s IESG telechat. Jari On 03 Feb 2017, at 01:03, Joel Halpern wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Not Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review T

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-19

On 05 Feb 2017, at 19:43, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Thanks a lot for your review Brian. +1 Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-07

Thanks for your review, Pete. Authors, any comments? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-harkins-owe-05

Thanks for your review, Lucy! Jari On 09 Dec 2016, at 18:17, Lucy Yong wrote: > Reviewer: Lucy Yong > Review result: Ready with Nits > > The draft is nearly ready for the publication. > > Minor comment: Suggest adding this in security considerations: OWE > provides encryption over the wireles

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-08

Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12

Thanks for your review, Stewart. I set the my position to “No objection” for this document in the upcoming IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.

Re: [Gen-art] [Int-area] Review of draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-04

Roni: Thanks for your review! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-01

Thanks for your review, Jouni. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

Elwyn, Christer — many thanks for the in-depth review and updates. I have posted a “no objection” position for this document for tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing l

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-04

Many thanks for the review, Robert. These reviews are much appreciated, and at least from my perspective, improve the quality of the RFCs. Happy to hear from Benjamin that he’s considering the editorial issues Robert found in this case. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPG

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05

Thanks! On 27 Jan 2017, at 20:20, Brian Carpenter wrote: > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready > > Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents bein

Re: [Gen-art] [Softwires] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-12

Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for your review, Christer! Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? Jari On 01 Feb 2017, at 21:57, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for t

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-16

Thanks for your review(s) Francis! On 21 Jan 2017, at 14:22, Francis Dupont wrote: > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review result: Ready > > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14 already reviewed for Last Call > and the few nits were addressed in newer versions. > > > __

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-08

Thanks for your review, Dan. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05

Thanks for your review, Paul, and thanks for the discussion, Mike. I think there’s text in 5226bis about it being possible to ask people to post things to a mailing list. Jari On 26 Jan 2017, at 22:05, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > On 1/26/17 3:48 PM, Mike Jones wrote: >> The designated experts are s

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05

Thanks for your review, Stewart! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-11

Thanks for your re-review and support, Brian. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review postings (Was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-geojson-text-sequence-03)

Robert, Thanks for the review, again! And thank you so much (for the whole set of people) for the new review tool and integration to the tracker. It makes my life much easier. Just a couple of discussion points relating to how we post these today wrt. before when we didn’t have the new tool yet.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-holmberg-dispatch-mcptt-rp-namespace-03

Thanks for the reviews and responses, Fernando & Jörgen! I have balloted no-objection for this document on tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org ht

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15

Thanks for the review, Ralph, and for taking care of the edits, Lucy! Jari On 06 Jan 2017, at 17:46, Lucy yong wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > Thank you for the review. We will have all acronyms expansion in next version > and add a reference for DC services. > > Regards, > Lucy > > -Original Me

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-03

Many thanks again for the review, Dan. Thanks for the explanation re: the title, Steve — I was also wondering about it at first. I have posted a no-objection position for this document in tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail _

Re: [Gen-art] draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-13

FYI I posted a no-objection vote for this document in tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-13

Thanks Ken and Stewart! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08

Thanks for your review, Paul. Authors, have you seen these comments? Didn’t see a response. From my perspective "unnumbered" is still ok — we’ve traditionally called unnumbered interfaces such interfaces that have no address. But they typically would still have ifIndexes etc. But maybe some add

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-10

Thanks again for your review, Meral. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-23

Thanks! On 18 Jan 2017, at 20:37, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-rfc6439bis-04

Thanks for the review, Christer, and responses, Donald! There’s some discussion to be had here I guess with acronyms etc but I have posted a no-objection position for today’s IESG telechat. Jari On 19 Jan 2017, at 06:27, Donald Eastlake wrote: > Hi Christer, > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:07 P

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-21

Dan: Many thanks for the review, and thanks to Randall and others for the edits. I have balloted no-objection for this document on tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-07

Joel, Ram — thanks for the review and fixes! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-13

Many thanks for this substantive review, Robert. I think we should finish this discussion and figure out what changes may be needed, before we can complete the approval for this doc. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10

> Summary: Ready with nits. > > Major issues: 0 > > Minor issues: 0 > > Nits/editorial comments: > - S1: s/source of Media, such as from one or more Capture > Devices./source of Media from one or more Capture Devices./ > - S1: s/SIP offer answer/SIP Offer/Answer model/ > - S1: s/recommendations,

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10

Thanks for your (re-)review, Peter! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-14

Kiitos! jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-06

Thanks! On 15 Jan 2017, at 11:58, Roni Even wrote: > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-trill-directory-assist-mechanisms-10.txt

Thanks for the review, Francis, and thanks for considering the input, Donald. I’ve placed a no-obj vote for this document on tomorrow’s IESG call. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-adid-urn-02

Thanks! On 17 Dec 2016, at 05:36, Brian Carpenter wrote: > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready > > Gen-ART telechat review of draft-adid-urn-02 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processe

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

Many thanks Elwyn for your detailed review. I also found the discussion afterwards enlightening. I’m expecting the authors to draw some conclusions re: possible modifications based on the questions and answers. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05

Orit: thanks for your review. FWIW, I agree with your comments. Authors? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

Thanks! On 05 Jan 2017, at 07:53, Wassim Haddad wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06 > Reviewer: Wassim Haddad >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02

Thanks! On 04 Jan 2017, at 03:53, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD >

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-03

Dan & all: Thanks for the review, re-review, and changes! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-09

Many thanks for your detailed review, Stewart! Authors, did you take a note of Stewart's editorial comments? The editorial control is in your hands, but I’d like to know that you saw the comments. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __

Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

Thanks for the review, Robert. And thank you WG/authors for this much needed document. I think the document is ready to move forward (although I agree with Robert re: the first sentence of the Security considerations section — IMHO, the authors should remove, reformulate, or add other referenc

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered-03

Thanks for the review Vijay, and everyone for the discussion. I think I’m fine with the section headings as they are; it is clear at least to me what is meant. The choice between a sentence at the beginning of the section or in the section title should be up to you, as long as the end result is

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21

Russ et al: Thank you for the review, changes, and re-review! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >