[Gen-art] Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-09

> On 11. May 2024, at 05:49, Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

> On 7. Jun 2018, at 02:40, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Please see inline. > >>> On 4. Jun 2018, at 05:17, Christer Holmberg >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Re-sent due to wrong e-mail address. >>> Hi, I have also looked at this document, and there are thing

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

> On 7. Jun 2018, at 02:43, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > > Hi, > >>> Not a comment on the document, but a question/suggestion: >>> >>> If you want to have a place holder for changes to be done in the bis >>> (which seems to be the main purpose of the errata document), why not >>> create a G

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

> On 4. Jun 2018, at 07:06, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Not a comment on the document, but a question/suggestion: > > If you want to have a place holder for changes to be done in the bis > (which seems to be the main purpose of the errata document), why not > create a GitHub repo for the bis

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

Hi Christer, thank you very much for the review. Sorry about the late response, I'm currently traveling. See my replies in-line. Best regards Michael > On 4. Jun 2018, at 05:17, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > > Re-sent due to wrong e-mail address. > >> >> Hi, >> >> I have also looked at

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12

ctplab/sctp-idata/commit/768dac9acbeff654ecea782bf682392fad4d4709 makes the text more readable. > > I am correcting the review. Thanks for the quick feedback! Best regards Michael > > - Stewart > > > On 25/08/2017 11:53, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> On 14. Aug 2017, at 22:02, St

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12

> On 14. Aug 2017, at 22:02, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > Hi Stewart, thanks for your review. See my comment in-line. Best regards Michael > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IE

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07.txt

On 31 Dec 2014, at 15:08, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:39, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > On 10/30/2014 07:15 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> Right. However, we wanted to make sure that there is no assumption >> on the number of concurrent RTP flows. There are scenarios where >> you will have no concurrent flow

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-08.txt

On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:05, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:02, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thanks for the review, Vijay. Authors/shepherds, do you have any responses to > Vijay’s question below? > > Jari > > On 29 Oct 2014, at 22:15, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Ge

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-07

On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > On 01/11/2013 11:11 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> thank you very much for your comments. > > Michael: Thank you for attending to my comments. Please see inline. Vijay, thanks for the comments. See my comments in-line. >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-07

On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Dec 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > On 12/02/2011 02:11 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> What about: >> >> One important thing to remember about SCTP streams is that they >> are uni-directional. The endpoint for which a stream is an outgoing >> s

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > On 11/30/2011 02:19 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> - S5, second paragraph --- "The procedures outlined in this section are >>> designed so that the incoming side will always reset their stream >>> sequen

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > On 11/30/2011 02:19 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> - S5, second paragraph --- "The procedures outlined in this section are >>> designed so that the incoming side will always reset their stream >>> sequen

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Nov 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review: draft-ietf-tls-dtls-heartbeat-03.txt

Mary, thank you very much for the review. See my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Oct 28, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Mary Barnes wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenAr

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01.txt

On Oct 6, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Michael, > Thanks for the quick response. Please see comments inline. > > On 10-10-06 01:50 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> Hi Suresh, >> thank you very much for the review. See my comments in-line. >> Best

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01.txt

Hi Suresh, thank you very much for the review. See my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Oct 6, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestra

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rserpool-common-param-16.txt

Hi Suresh, comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Apr 15, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for > draft-ietf-rserpool-common-param-16.txt > > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >

[Gen-art] Re: Follow-up Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-02

Hi Christian, fine with me. Jon, please let me know if you need an updated ID (including the IANA text change) after the telechat or not. Best regards Michael On Nov 15, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Christian Vogt wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this d

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-01

Hi Ken, Hi Jon, should I do this in the .xml sources or do you want to do it? I can send you the sources. There is also one change requested from Jon. Jon should we resubmit the ID with the changes included or wait for more comments? Best regards Michael On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Ken Mornea

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-07.txt

Hi David, comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Feb 21, 2007, at 4:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael, I think we're basically done here - see a few more inline comments (and more snips of things that are resolved). Thanks, --David On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-07.txt

Randy, there are a number of small changes / added text which are (for me) easiest handled by just updating the ID. I would do it anyway and use a CVS diff to generate a diff on the xml and then transform that in the RFC editor style comments. But I think it is also easier for the RFC editor to

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-07.txt

David, see my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Replying to my original email interspersing Michael's comments and my new comments to indicate where we are. My new comments are set off by DLB>. I think this is very close to settled.

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART sctp-auth-07.txt - AUTH chunk location

David, some comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy, (1) The AUTH chunk comes before the material it authenticates, preventing pipelined computation of the MAC. IPsec experience indicates that this may not be a good

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-07.txt

Hi David, see my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Feb 20, 2007, at 3:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).