reads the RFCs listed as normative to
understand the draft. The Experimental RFCs are not even a downward
reference in this case as this draft is not being published on the
Standards Track.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)
___
Gen-art
it to person with expertise to write the
specification about that token to consider the security
implications. Adding text to discuss about cross-site scripting
might be misconstrued as a recommendation.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen
for a summary of an analysis of the interoperability of
the commands and tags.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG Secretary
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
which are used here.
Yes, this is to avoid gratuitous changes when advancing the
specification from Draft Standard to Full Standard.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art