Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-sids-03

Hi Reece, Thanks a lot for your review. Please find responses inline. > On Oct 26, 2023, at 3:46 PM, Reese Enghardt via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Reese Enghardt > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-AR

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-17

Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-13

Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06

Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-47

Hi Nabil, Roni's telechat review is for the version on which I issued the ballot (in this case it is -47). If you think the issue is resolved in a later version (I do not believe so in this case), you can respond to point out the actual text change that you made to address Roni’s comment. Tha

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04

Hi Roni, Thanks for your comments. Please find responses inline. > On Apr 15, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Roni Even wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [Gen-art] Your Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis

Thanks Elwyn and Bernie. I will approve the draft as soon as the new version posts. Regards Suresh From: Bernie Volz (volz) Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 7:52:51 PM To: Elwyn Davies Cc: Suresh Krishnan; gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-03.txt

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 11:16 PM, Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki) > wrote: > > Hi Francis, > > Please see inline responses. Also, please find attached version 04 of the > draft attached to this email. I will upload the new version once you approve > the rework. Or would you want the updated draft to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05

Thanks Meral and Zhiwei. Regards Suresh On 2/16/17, 12:22 AM, "Z.W. Yan" wrote: Dear Meral, Based on you comments, a new version of this draft was generated and submitted. Thank you so much for pushing this work. BR, Zhiwei --- A new versio

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

> On Feb 14, 2017, at 2:14 PM, otr...@employees.org wrote: > > Stewart, > > >> Maybe we could sort this out faster with a short phone call. > > Yes, we can certainly do that! Let me know if you would like me to call in as well. Thanks Suresh smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic sign

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Mike, On Feb 10, 2017 11:30 PM, "C. M. Heard" wrote: On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45 -0800 , Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 10/02/2017 23:20, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > On 10/02/2017 03:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > On 10/02/2017 04:19, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > > > I wonder if we would best ser

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hi Charlie, > On Feb 10, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Charlie Perkins > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > The last two days have been crammed full with other urgent work requirements. > I will respond to these comments today. Great. > > Suresh, do you mean to ask if I can submit a revised document before

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hi Charlie, I have not yet seen a response to this review. Do you think you will be able to get to this in the next day or two? The document is on the February 16 2017 telechat and I would like to see resolution to these issues in time for the other ADs to ballot. Thanks Suresh On 2/2/17, 1:

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-19

Thanks a lot for your review Brian. Regards Suresh > On Feb 4, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Brian Carpenter > wrote: > > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready > > Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-19 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for the review Christer. And thanks for taking care of this quickly Kim. Regards Suresh > On Feb 1, 2017, at 11:43 PM, kkinnear wrote: > > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> Thanks for your review, Christer! >> >> Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? >

Re: [Gen-art] GenART post-telechat comment on draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-08

Hi Tiru, On 09/07/2016 10:50 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote: > Please see inline > > *From:*Pete Resnick [mailto:presn...@qti.qualcomm.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 7, 2016 8:53 PM > *To:* Suresh Krishnan > *Cc:* IESG ; General Area Review Team ; > draft-ie

Re: [Gen-art] GenART post-telechat comment on draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-08

Hi Pete, On 09/06/2016 12:05 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > Greetings, > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other participant

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field-06

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field-06.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2016-02-02 Telechat Date: 2016-02-04 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but has some issue

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-pcr-04

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-isis-pcr-04.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2016-01-05 Telechat Date: 2016-01-07 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I have a minor comment that you

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-09.txt

re-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-09.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/12/01 IESG Telechat date: 2015/12/03 Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-04.txt

-third-party-id-option-04.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/11/17 IESG Telechat date: 2015/11/19 Summary: The draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I do have a major issue that needs to be addressed. Major = * Section 5.2 The draft is a bit underspecif

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-11.txt

Hi Kent, On 10/22/2015 06:03 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > [+barry] > > I apologize to reply to myself, but I would be remiss to not mention that > Barry Leiba had a related COMMENT on the "must immediately start” text. His > suggestion is to remove the words “MUST immediately” (i.e. Just have > “

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-type-p-monitor-02.txt

ed by GIM>>. > > Regards, > Greg > > -Original Message- > From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:13 PM > To: draft-ietf-ippm-type-p-monitor@ietf.org; General Area Review Team > Subject:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-11.txt

f-call-home-11.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/10/20 IESG Telechat date: 2015/10/22 Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I do have a comment that you may wish to address. Minor = * Section 3.1 S3: The server cannot immediately start the SSH

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-type-p-monitor-02.txt

type-p-monitor-02.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/10/20 IESG Telechat date: 2015/10/22 Summary: The draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I do have some comments that you may wish to address. Minor = * MBZ is not expanded. I understand this should exp

Re: [Gen-art] Comments on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-14

Hi Paul, Your proposed changes completely resolve my concerns on -13. Thanks for taking care of this. Cheers Suresh On 09/22/2015 04:50 PM, Paul E. Jones wrote: > Folks, > Alissa asked me to review the current text, provide input, and help > address some of the current DISCUSS points. > Here

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-conex-tcp-modifications

onica >> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 4:50 PM >> To: 'Suresh Krishnan' ; gen-art@ietf.org >> Cc: draft-ietf-conex-tcp-modifications@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-conex-tcp-modifications >> >> Suresh,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-conex-tcp-modifications

Hi Ron, Thanks for your review. Please find comments inline. On 09/08/2015 12:20 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03.txt

Hi Robert, Thanks for your quick response. Your explanations sound good. On 09/02/2015 10:52 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: >> * Section 2 >> >> Not sure what the "draft's primary email alias" refers to. Is this the >> draft-...@ietf.org or draft-foo@ietf.org? In either case it may make >> sense

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-07.txt

Hi Russ, Thanks for addressing the comments. Your suggested changes look good. I have one clarification and one additional text change request inline. On 09/01/2015 07:41 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > Suresh: > > Thanks for the review. > >> Summary: The draft is almost ready for publication as a B

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03.txt

enarea-review-tracker-03.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/09/01 IESG Telechat date: 2015/09/03 Summary: The draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have some comments you may wish to address. * Section 2 Not sure what the "draft's primary email alia

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03.txt

enarea-review-tracker-03.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/09/01 IESG Telechat date: 2015/09/03 Summary: The draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have some comments you may wish to address. * Section 2 Not sure what the "draft's primary email alia

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-09

Hi Robert, Thanks a lot for your careful review. Please find responses inline. On 08/26/2015 04:20 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair.

Re: [Gen-art] [bfcpbis] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13.txt

Hi Tom, On 08/20/2015 08:29 AM, Tom Kristensen wrote: > Thanks for the Gen-ART review. Response and hopefully a resolution > inline below. > > > On 2 March 2015 at 18:19, Suresh Krishnan <mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-AR

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat (re)review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-12.txt

prefix-link-attr-12.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/08/19 IESG Telechat date: 2015/08/20 Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks for taking care of the comments from my last call review of version -10. Thanks

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

Hi Acee, I checked out the changes in the new version (12) and they look good. Thanks a lot for taking care of the changes. Only one pending comment from me. I will send in a new review. On 08/19/2015 06:53 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> * IANA Considerations >> >> * The Opaque LSA Options

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

prefix-link-attr-10.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/08/18 IESG Telechat date: 2015/08/20 Summary: The draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard but there are some minor issues that need to be addressed as stated in my last call review. We are on the process of conv

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-07.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the General Area director. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: The draft is a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

Hi Peter, Thanks for your quick response. Please find comments inline. On 08/17/2015 10:12 AM, Peter Psenak wrote: > Hi Suresh, > > please see inline: > > > On 8/14/15 05:41 , Suresh Krishnan wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015-08-13 IETF LC End Date: 2015-08-13 Summary: The draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard but there are some minor issues that need to be addressed. * Section 2 * In the packet format described in Figure

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-08.txt

g-text-markdown-08.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/07/08 IESG Telechat date: 2015/07/09 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but there are some minor issues that need to be fixed. * Section 6.1.2. s/not even case may be/not even the case

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-topologies-update-08.txt

re-rtp-topologies-update-08.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/06/25 IESG Telechat date: 2015/06/24 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but I do have one comment you may wish to consider. Minor: I think it would be great if the document had a s

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-24.txt

eb-rtp-usage-24.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/06/09 IESG Telechat date: 2015/06/11 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ie

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dprive-problem-statement-05.txt

dprive-problem-statement-05.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/06/09 IESG Telechat date: 2015/06/11 Summary: Thank you for this very interesting and well written document. This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few minor comments you may wish to co

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-01.txt

at-mib-v1-01.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015-04-29 IETF LC End Date: 2015-04-29 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib-03.txt

03.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015-04-29 IETF LC End Date: 2015-04-29 Summary: There are some minor issues in the draft that need to be fixed before publication as a Proposed Standard. * Some objects and the their textual conventions vary only by case. There are three such ins

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-11.txt

ension-manual-keying-11.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015-03-24 IETF LC End Date: 2015-03-25 Summary: The draft is ready for publication as Proposed Standard. All the issues I brought up on the -09 version have been addressed. Thanks

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-faltstrom-uri-13.txt

uri-13.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/03/10 IESG Telechat date: 2015/03/12 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13.txt

Resending as there seems to be some issue with the tools aliases. Forwarded Message Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13.txt Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 17:19:26 + From: Suresh Krishnan To: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis

[Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-09.txt

Resending as there seems to be some issues with the tools aliases. Forwarded Message Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-09.txt Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 04:55:24 -0500 From: Suresh Krishnan To: draft-ietf-ccamp

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13.txt

fcpbis-rfc4582bis-13.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/03/02 IESG Telechat date: 2015/03/05 Summary: This draft has significant issues that needs to be fixed before it is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major: * Section 5.1: This section mandates the receiver to ignore the

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-09.txt

-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-09.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/03/02 IESG Telechat date: 2015/03/05 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but I do have some comments you may wish to address. Minor: * Section 5 Isn't separating static

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-04

Hi Brian, Thanks for the review. Ole, thanks for the quick followup. Please find comments inline. On 02/07/2015 05:49 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > Brian, > > thank you very much for the review. > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ a

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-19.txt

chanec-pkcs11uri-19.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/02/03 IESG Telechat date: 2015/02/05 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ie

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-htpbis-rfc7238bis-02.txt

ttpbis-rfc7238bis-02.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/02/03 IESG Telechat date: 2015/02/05 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. I do have a nit you may want to look at, but feel free to ignore. Nit: As it is just a republication of the experimental R

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-10.txt

. Authors, are you taking this into account? Jari On 07 Jan 2015, at 08:10, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Please wait for direction from your do

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-10.txt

remote-lfa-10.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2015/01/06 IESG Telechat date: 2015/01/08 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I have some minor issues that the authors may wish to address. Section 4.2.1.1: This sentence is missing a verb (reach?

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-josefsson-pkix-textual-09.txt

n-pkix-textual-09.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/12/16 IESG Telechat date: 2014/12/18 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ie

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-eman-battery-mib-15

attery-mib-15 Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/12/16 IESG Telechat date: 2014/12/18 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-11

: draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-11.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/10/28 IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-15.txt

: draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-15.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/10/28 IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Historic RFC, but I have some comments you may wish to address. * Section 7.1 The Length field of the IP address TLV in case the IP

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt

: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/10/28 IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30 Summary: The document is almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard, but I do have a comment you may wish to consider. * Sections 5.2 and 5.3 -> The document uses some

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09.txt

: draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/10/28 IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30 Summary: The draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard but has some issues that need to be addressed. * Section 2 -> There is no refere

Re: [Gen-art] The coin toss (was Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-05.txt)

Hi Woj, On 10/14/2014 11:41 AM, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote: Hi Suresh, your description, which I don¹t dispute, does not convey the importance of Q5, which ultimately was the question the chairs verified via the call on the WG mailer. I.e. The choices for progressing the MAP-T draft, post split

[Gen-art] The coin toss (was Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-05.txt)

Hi Dan, On 10/13/2014 10:46 AM, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote: Hello Dan, Thank you for you comments. I’m reading an updated draft, however there is one point that I am unable to address fully: “2."2.The status of this document is Experimental. It is not clear why. There are no experimental docume

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-08

Hi Brian, Thanks for the review. I will follow up with the authors on this. I had a concern about the author list as well and I recorded it in the Shepherd writeup. The number of authors is high because the document is a merge of competing documents and we felt that going with the long autho

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33.txt

: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/09/30 IESG Telechat date: 2014/10/02 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Early review of draft-brownlee-svg-rfc-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-brownlee-svg-rfc-07 For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is on track to be pub

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery-14

: draft-ietf-p2psip-service-discovery-14.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/08/05 IESG Telechat date: 2014/08/07 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-eman-battery-mib-12

. Document: draft-ietf-eman-battery-mib-12 Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/07/08 IESG Telechat date: 2014/07/10 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-06

Hi Francis, On 06/25/2014 04:24 AM, Francis Dupont wrote: > Suresh Krishnan writes: > >> Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed >> Standard but I have a comment you might wish to address. >> * Section 2 >> >> The Encode_96 function

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-06

. Document: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-06.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/06/24 IESG Telechat date: 2014/06/26 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I have a comment you might wish to address. * Section 2 The Encode_96 function mentions

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-03

: draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-03.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/05/27 IESG Telechat date: 2014/05/29 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Thanks Suresh ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-06.txt

- > From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com] > Sent: March-25-14 6:46 PM > To: Suresh Krishnan > Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg@tools.ietf.org; General Area > Review Team > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg- > 06.txt >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-06.txt

: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-06.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2014/03/25 IESG Telechat date: 2014/03/27 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. * Section 4.1 (b) The

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-05

Hi Valery, Thanks a lot for quickly addressing my comments. Your proposed resolutions sound good to me. Cheers Suresh On 03/13/2014 02:03 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote: Hi Suresh, thank you for the review. Please find my answers below. - Original Message - *From:* Suresh

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-05 For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review ofdraft-ietf-avtext-rtp-duplication-04.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-duplication-04 For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09.txt

On 17 Dec 2013, at 07:25, Magnus Westerlund wrote: Thanks Suresh, We will take your comment into account when we do the next revision. Cheers Magnus On 2013-12-17 06:23, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09.txt

: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/12/16 IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/19 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. Minor = * Section 1 This

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt

Hi Randy, Thanks for the quick response. Your proposed changes sound good to me. Regards Suresh - Original Message - From: Randy Bush To: Jari Arkko Cc: Suresh Krishnan , "draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl@tools.ietf.org" , General Area Review Team Sent: 12/4/2013 6:21

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt

: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/12/03 IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/05 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. Minor = * Section 4 ->

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-05.txt

Hi Christian/Med, I checked out the -06 version submitted this morning, and it addresses all my comments. Thanks for taking care of this quickly. Regards Suresh On 11/19/2013 05:47 AM, christian.jacque...@orange.com wrote: > Hello Suresh, > > Thanks for your review. We will update the draft in

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-05.txt

: draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-05.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/11/18 IESG Telechat date: 2013/11/21 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. Minor = * Section 2.1 ->

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt

: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/11/17 IESG Telechat date: 2013/11/21 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP but I do have some issues that you may wish to consider * Sections 4.12.5 and 4.13.5 Since these options are

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-housley-smime-oids-00.txt

: draft-housley-smime-oids-00.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/11/17 IESG Telechat date: 2013/11/21 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a comment that you may wish to consider. Minor = * The draft is setting up initial values for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-worley-service-example-13.txt

Hi Dale, On 10/21/2013 06:09 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: >> From: wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) >> >>> From: Suresh Krishnan >> >>> Minor >>> = >>> >>> * Please add an IANA considerations section to the draft stating tha

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-worley-service-example-13.txt

ake up with the RFC Editor? > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Dale R. Worley <mailto:wor...@ariadne.com>> wrote: > > > From: Suresh Krishnan <mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com>> > > > Enhancement request > >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-worley-service-example-13.txt

: draft-worley-service-example-13.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/10/08 IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/10 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. Minor = * Please add an IANA

Re: [Gen-art] [netext] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com] > Sent: September-24-13 1:57 PM > To: Suresh Krishnan > Cc: General Area Review Team; net...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netext-update- > notificati...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netext] Gen-ART LC review: dra

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review ofdraft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update-03 For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is ready

Re: [Gen-art] [netext] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07

Hi Robert, Thanks a lot for the review. We will include the changes in the next revision we submit. Please see proposed changes inline. On 08/22/2013 02:05 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-05.txt

: draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-05.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/08/12 IESG Telechat date: 2013/08/15 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. Minor = * Section 1 Aren't actu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lisp-mib-08

Hi Jari, I went through the draft and it looks OK. I just had one minor issue with some example math in the draft. The following math in the Example 3 of lispMapCacheEntry is wrong and needs to get fixed. 11 - (2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 4) = 1 I don't think that this should hold the draft up as

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem-07.txt

: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem-07.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/06/24 IESG Telechat date: 2013/06/27 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few comments that the authors may want to consider. Minor = * Section 2.3 The

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07.txt

: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/06/10 IESG Telechat date: 2013/06/13 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but I had a few minor comments as identified in my last call review dated 2013/05/08. The

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-08.txt

: draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-08.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/06/10 IESG Telechat date: 2013/06/13 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but has some minor issues that need to be fixed as identified in my last call review dated 2013/04/16

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07

Hi Martin, Thank you for the quick response. I am fine with all the changes you have proposed. I will look at the next rev as soon as it becomes available. Thanks Suresh - Original Message - From: Martin Thomson To: Suresh Krishnan , General Area Review Team , "draft-ietf-ge

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07 For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-metrics-rationale-03.txt

Hi Christopher, Thanks for your quick response. Trimming the stuff we agree on On 04/24/2013 05:18 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote: > Thank you for this, some comments below, marked CD> (Generally, where I > haven't commented, I think the point is good.) > >> -> Describe a short algorithm

  1   2   3   4   >