Mr.Brim,
Thank you for your comment and suggestion.
We will update the draft reflecting your idea
if we have no other comments.
Best Regards,
Jun
> On 8/21/08 5:35 AM, actech allegedly wrote:
>> Mr.Brim and Mr.Jennings,
>>
>> Thank you for your comments.
>>
&
Mr.Brim and Mr.Jennings,
Thank you for your comments.
> > I still make a friendly suggestion that you document that dependency,
> > because if there is an extension to the ATRAC specification in the
> > future to support a higher bit rate, this protocol might break.
> >
> > Scott
> > If we assum
Mr.Brim,
Thank you for your comments for 16th version of ATARC payload format.
We agree with almost of your comments, and modified the draft
according to that. However, for one issue (regarding on Fragment Number),
we did not change the draft by the reason described below.
You can see the latest
Hi all,
Most of the issues that Scott pointed out are specific and clear.
We hope we will update the draft and submit it in soon.
Any other comments or advise are very helpful to us, of course.
Regards, Matsumoto
I think Scott has raised some issues here that should be addressed.
Can folks sor
