[Gen-art] Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-09

> On 11. May 2024, at 05:49, Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-15

> On 15. Oct 2021, at 00:53, Ines Robles via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

> On 7. Jun 2018, at 02:40, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Please see inline. > >>> On 4. Jun 2018, at 05:17, Christer Holmberg >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Re-sent due to wrong e-mail address. >>> Hi, I have also looked at this document, and there are

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

> On 7. Jun 2018, at 02:43, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > > Hi, > >>> Not a comment on the document, but a question/suggestion: >>> >>> If you want to have a place holder for changes to be done in the bis >>> (which seems to be the main purpose of the errata document), why not >>> create a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

> On 4. Jun 2018, at 07:06, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Not a comment on the document, but a question/suggestion: > > If you want to have a place holder for changes to be done in the bis > (which seems to be the main purpose of the errata document), why not > create a GitHub repo for the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06

Hi Christer, thank you very much for the review. Sorry about the late response, I'm currently traveling. See my replies in-line. Best regards Michael > On 4. Jun 2018, at 05:17, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > > Re-sent due to wrong e-mail address. > >> >> Hi, >> >> I have also looked at

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12

> On 14. Aug 2017, at 22:02, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > Hi Stewart, thanks for your review. See my comment in-line. Best regards Michael > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07.txt

On 31 Dec 2014, at 15:08, Francis Dupont francis.dup...@fdupont.fr wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:39, Vijay K. Gurbani v...@bell-labs.com wrote: On 10/30/2014 07:15 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: Right. However, we wanted to make sure that there is no assumption on the number of concurrent RTP flows. There are scenarios where you will have no concurrent flow, scenarios

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-08.txt

On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:05, Alexey Melnikov alexey.melni...@isode.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:02, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote: Thanks for the review, Vijay. Authors/shepherds, do you have any responses to Vijay’s question below? Jari On 29 Oct 2014, at 22:15, Vijay K. Gurbani v...@bell-labs.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-07

On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-07

On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: On 01/11/2013 11:11 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: thank you very much for your comments. Michael: Thank you for attending to my comments. Please see inline. Vijay, thanks for the comments. See my comments in-line. - S4.1, second paragraph

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: On 11/30/2011 02:19 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote: - S5, second paragraph --- The procedures outlined in this section are designed so that the incoming side will always reset their stream sequence number first before the outgoing side which

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Dec 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: On 12/02/2011 02:11 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: What about: tOne important thing to remember about SCTP streams is that they are uni-directional. The endpoint for which a stream is an outgoing stream is called the outgoing side

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Nov 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-12

On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: On 11/30/2011 02:19 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote: - S5, second paragraph --- The procedures outlined in this section are designed so that the incoming side will always reset their stream sequence number first before the outgoing side which

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review: draft-ietf-tls-dtls-heartbeat-03.txt

Mary, thank you very much for the review. See my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Oct 28, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Mary Barnes wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01.txt

Hi Suresh, thank you very much for the review. See my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Oct 6, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01.txt

On Oct 6, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks for the quick response. Please see comments inline. On 10-10-06 01:50 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote: Hi Suresh, thank you very much for the review. See my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Oct 6, 2010, at 7:29 AM

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rserpool-common-param-16.txt

Hi Suresh, comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Apr 15, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-rserpool-common-param-16.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-01

Hi Ken, Hi Jon, should I do this in the .xml sources or do you want to do it? I can send you the sources. There is also one change requested from Jon. Jon should we resubmit the ID with the changes included or wait for more comments? Best regards Michael On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Ken

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-07.txt

Hi David, comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Feb 21, 2007, at 4:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael, I think we're basically done here - see a few more inline comments (and more snips of things that are resolved). Thanks, --David On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]