Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

2016-01-05 Thread Ralph Droms (rdroms)
Confirming that rev -15 addresses my Gen-ART review comments... - Ralph > On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:19 AM 12/16/15, Ralph Droms (rdroms) > wrote: > > >> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov >> wrote: >> >> Hi Ralph, >> Thank you

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

2015-12-17 Thread Jari Arkko
Alexey, Ralph: Thanks for the review & edits! Jari On 16 Dec 2015, at 18:36, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > On 16/12/2015 16:19, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: >>> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov >>> wrote:

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

2015-12-16 Thread Alexey Melnikov
Hi Ralph, Thank you for your review. Sorry I missed it earlier. On 09/12/2015 20:47, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: Nits/editorial comments: Nicely written, very clear document. Thank you. idnits reports some lines too long and an unused reference. I fixed the reference in my copy. I hope RFC

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

2015-12-16 Thread Ralph Droms (rdroms)
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov > wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > Thank you for your review. Sorry I missed it earlier. You're welcome. Looks like we have agreement on my editorial comments and suggestions. Will the edits you mention below appear

[Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

2015-12-09 Thread Ralph Droms (rdroms)
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at