Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04

Folks, I don’t know what to do with this draft. I’ve read the draft, prompted by Paul’s review. While I can understand most of what it says, I have to say it is a very difficult read. Probably due to the large complex system that it is a part of. But, I’ve been thoroughly unable to convince my

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04

On 8/15/16 2:50 PM, Eric C Rosen wrote: Thanks for your review. On 8/9/2016 4:41 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: it will be unlikely that a new implementer, schooled in the subject matter, will be able to create a correct implementation. The material in this draft describes running code. There are

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04

Thanks for your review. On 8/9/2016 4:41 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: it will be unlikely that a new implementer, schooled in the subject matter, will be able to create a correct implementation. The material in this draft describes running code. There are at least two independent, interoperable

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at