Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

Christer, thank you for your review. Authors, thanks for taking on board his comment about Section 4. I have entered a DISCUSS and COMMENT ballot position based on my own review of the document. Alissa > On Sep 29, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Hi, > >> We discussed your

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

Hi, >We discussed your first comment and we agree with Toerless's response. We >believe that the intro does express the intent and purpose of this BCP >adequately. Based on your second comment, we have changed the title of >Section 4 to "Functional Guidelines". The new version has been uploaded.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

Hi Christer, We discussed your first comment and we agree with Toerless's response. We believe that the intro does express the intent and purpose of this BCP adequately. Based on your second comment, we have changed the title of Section 4 to "Functional Guidelines". The new version has been upl

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 12:16:18PM +, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg R