Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:39, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > On 10/30/2014 07:15 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> Right. However, we wanted to make sure that there is no assumption >> on the number of concurrent RTP flows. There are scenarios where >> you will have no concurrent flow, scenarios where you have

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

On 10/30/2014 07:15 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: Right. However, we wanted to make sure that there is no assumption on the number of concurrent RTP flows. There are scenarios where you will have no concurrent flow, scenarios where you have some, but they are inactive, and also scenarios where you ha

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:02, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thanks for the review, Vijay. Authors/shepherds, do you have any responses to > Vijay’s question below? > > Jari > > On 29 Oct 2014, at 22:15, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Ge

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

Thanks for the review, Vijay. Authors/shepherds, do you have any responses to Vijay’s question below? Jari On 29 Oct 2014, at 22:15, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-12 Review