Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2017-01-20 Thread Brian E Carpenter
FYI, I have checked the -18 draft that just appeared and it answers all my points. If asked to review it again, I expect to say "Ready". Thanks Brian Carpenter On 11/12/2016 11:39, Brian Carpenter wrote: > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Almost Ready > > Gen-ART Last Call review of

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2017-01-04 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Thomas, The responses to my comments almost all look fine to me. Just one point, on MINOR COMMENT 4 (slide 8): "Shouldn't this also say that this value MUST NOT be used in operational networks?" We've seen many cases over the years of informal values making it into shipped products... genera

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2017-01-04 Thread Thomas Watteyne
Brian, all, We have discussed the possible resolutions to your comments with Xavi. I have captured those in a slideset [1] to be presented at this Friday's interim meeting [2]. Early comments about the discussions and proposed resoltuion in the slideset, in preparation for their presentation on F

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2017-01-04 Thread Thomas Watteyne
Brian, Just a quick admin update that the authors have taken your comments into account, which will be integrated in -18. We will discuss the proposed resolutions at an interim meeting this Friday and publish it next week. Thomas On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Brian Carpenter < brian.e.carpen..

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2016-12-10 Thread Brian Carpenter
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Almost Ready Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these c