Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

2017-02-01 Thread Jari Arkko
Elwyn, Christer — many thanks for the in-depth review and updates. I have posted a “no objection” position for this document for tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

2017-01-25 Thread Christer Holmberg
Hi Elwyn, >That's all fine. Re s4, para 2: First, i realised I missed another instance >of 'new' in the abstract. >I think that 'the' is correct in the new [sic] version in both places. It's >pernickety but when it was >'a new' what you have is shorthand for "a new protocol identifier to be

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-11

2017-01-25 Thread Elwyn Davies
Hi, Christer. Thanks for the rapid response. That's all fine.  Re s4, para 2: First, i realised I missed another instance of 'new' in the abstract.  I think that 'the' is correct in the new [sic] version in both places.  It's pernickety but when it was 'a new' what you have is shorthand for "a