Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

ternative wording to >> suggest? >> >> Thanks again, -- Mike >> >> -Original Message- From: Joel Halpern >> [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 6:18 AM To: >> A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; >> draft-ietf

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

-- Mike -Original Message- From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 6:18 AM To: A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint....@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05 The document is ne

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

To: A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint....@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05 The document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Upon re-review, the addition of section 3.4 raises a question

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

The document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Upon re-review, the addition of section 3.4 raises a question of clarity. As written, the text says that the hash function matters only to the original thumbprint provider. Should there be a little bit of text talking abou

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05 J