Hello, everyone,
I joined this list a couple days ago after reading through its archives,
which I embarked on after having come across the June 13th article in *The
Signpost* discussing the tiny percentage of self-identified female Wikipedia
editors. I'd missed the January *New York Times* article
On 22 June 2011 17:50, Charlotte J wrote:
> This has probably been far too long already for a number of folks on the
> list, so I'll conclude for now and share my thoughts on hosting pornography
> on Wikipedia; recruiting Girl Scouts as editors; another potential
> consideration not yet raised as
Hi Charlotte,
I managed to find the dispute and had a look at it. The editor concerned
definitely was being a bit of a prat in my view, and should have discussed the
matter with you before going on a reverting spree.
I would not have inserted the "sic" in that one quote, but otherwise you were
P.S. I echo Sue's sentiments. :)
Welcome, and thanks for your articulate letter.
Andreas
--- On Thu, 23/6/11, Charlotte J wrote:
From: Charlotte J
Subject: [Gendergap] As I was passing through...
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Thursday, 23 June, 2011, 1:50
Hello, everyone,
I joined
ions of "Liberty"; etc., in another email or two, after I've had a
> chance to look over again a few archived emails that it may help to quote
> or
> refer to specifically.
>
> I'm using a middle name to post here given that the list is open-archiv
Hi Charlotte,
I'd like to thank you for taking the time to provide a rundown of your
"Wikipedia career." I think it's useful for lots of us -- new and old
Wikipedians alike -- to hear stories of how people encounter Wikipedia, and
your providing the context of all your unproblematic encounters is
